|
Kaposi's sarcoma herpes-like virus (KSHV) is becoming more closely linked with
clinically manifest KS, but its true etiological role in the development of KS
and the factors surrounding its transmission and incubation period are unknown
at this time. There are, however, serological data indicating that infection
with KSHV antedates the development of KS, a first step in demonstrating
causality.
At ICAAC, Dr. Keolle, from Dr. Corey's group in Seattle, presented
data on KSHV in saliva. Most of the data came from DNA PCR; however, several
positive cultures were also reported. The table summarizes the results of the
study.
Dr. Koelle and colleagues also tested saliva for EBV and HHV-6. Both
are herpesviruses; the former is primarily transmitted by saliva, and the
latter is thought to be transmitted by saliva. In those who were positive for
KSHV and one of the other viruses, KSHV levels by PCR were 100-fold lower than
EBV levels but were equivalent to levels of HHV-6. Based on these data and a few
cultures from saliva, it was suggested that saliva may be an important source of
transmission of KSHV.
It is not clear how to reconcile these findings with the highly
circumscribed epidemiology of KS. The seroepi-demiology of KSHV antibody
clearly reflects non-ubiquitous transmission, as does clinically manifest KS.
Transmission by saliva would mean that KSHV infection would be much more highly
prevalent, perhaps universal, like the other herpesviruses that have been
discovered. However, KS is distinctly uncommon among HIV-infected injection
drug users and hemophiliacs. Even among gay men, it is clear that KS is
associated with higher levels of sexual activity. If saliva were an important
means of transmission, KS should be seen in a higher proportion of gay men than
the 20 to 30% who now develop it.
Much more work is necessary to identify the mode of transmission of
KSHV. The clues at the present time point to semen as the likely vehicle of
transmission of KSHV, but the sexual practices that may enhance transmission are
unknown at this time. If we think back to the early days of defining the route
of transmission of HIV among gay men, we can see the risk of anal receptive
intercourse emerged as the predominant means of transmission, allowing us to be
more rational in recommendations about saliva, tears and urine. In a similar
fashion, heterosexual transmission studies showed that factors such as genital
ulcer disease and lack of circumcision increased the likelihood the
transmission of HIV. Similar work needs to be done in order to define the
transmission of KSHV.
Clinical Stastus of Study
Participants | Number | Saliva KSHV PCR+ | PBMC+ KSHV PCR+ | | HIV+ & KS+ | 23 | 17* | 17* |
| HIV- & KS+ | 1 |
1 | 1 | | HIV+ & KS- | 17 | 2* | 2* |
| HIV- & KS- | 24 |
0 | 0 |
* The 17 who were positive in saliva and PBMC by PCR
were the same individuals. However, the 2 who were PBMC PCR+ were different
individuals than the 2 who were saliva PCR+ for KSHV DNA, thus making the total
positive 4 of 17. +PBMC = Peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
|