Print this page    •   Back to Web version of article

Safer Needle Devices: Protecting Health Care Workers

October 1997

Contents

Acknowledgment: This document was developed by the Office of Occupational Health Nursing, with significant contributions from Susan Elliott, ARNP, MSN, MPH, OSHA Nurse Intern, and Digna Walker, RN, B.S.N., OSHA Nurse Intern.


Acronyms and Abbreviations

CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CSHO Compliance Safety and Health Officer
FDA Food and Drug Administration
HBV Hepatitis B Virus
HCV Hepatitis C Virus
HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus
IM Intramuscular
IV Intravenous
MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
NCID National Center for Infectious Diseases
OPIM Other potentially infectious materials
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration


Purpose of this Packet

Q. What is the purpose of this packet?

A. The purpose of this packet is to:

Q. What are some questions that may be asked about safer needle devices and needlestick prevention programs?

A. Although OSHA does not review, approve, license, or endorse products, OSHA staff may receive questions about safer needle devices and therefore have an excellent opportunity to educate the public about the role of these devices in preventing needlestick injuries. Questions that may be asked include:

This guide will provide answers to these questions.


Epidemiology of Needlestick Injuries

Q. What is the epidemiology of needlestick injuries?

A. Five primary activities are associated with the majority of needlestick injuries. They are:

Since 1992, the International Health Care Worker Safety Center has gathered data on needlestick injuries from 63 cooperating hospitals around the country. The results of the data analysis provide us with a useful picture of the pattern of needlestick injuries leading to occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
Figure 1
Locations Where Percutaneous Injuries and Mucocutaneous Blood Exposures Occurred,
U.S. EPINet, 1995
63 hospitals, 3,552 total incidents
(Source: Ippolito, 1997)

Table 1
Health Care Workers Reporting Percutaneous and Mucocutaneous Blood Exposures, by Occupation, U.S. EPINet, 1995
(63 hospitals, 3,552 total exposures)
  Reported percutaneous and mucocutaneous blood exposures
Job Category No. %
Nurse RN/LPN 1,764 49.7%
M.D. (attending/resident) 446 12.6%
Attendant (non-surgical)/PCA/CNA 189 5.3%
Housekeeper/laundry worker/central supply 180 5.1%
Technologist (non-lab) 165 4.6%
Phlebotomist/venipuncture 160 4.5%
Clinical lab worker (non-phlebotomist) 143 4.0%
Surgery attendant/surgical technician 132 3.7%
Student 91 2.6%
Respiratory therapist 56 1.6%
Dental personnel 28 0.8%
Paramedic 17 0.5%
I.V. team 5 0.1%
Dialysis 4 0.1%
Other 172 4.8%
Total 3,552 100.0%
(Source: Ippolito, 1997)

Figure 2
Items Most Frequently Causing Sharp-Object Injuries, U.S. EPINet, 1995

63 hospitals, cases = 3,003
(Source: Ippolito, 1997)


Next
Table of Contents




This article was provided by U.S. Occupational Safety & Health Administration. You can find this article online by typing this address into your Web browser:
http://www.thebody.com/content/whatis/art5947.html

General Disclaimer: The Body is designed for educational purposes only and is not engaged in rendering medical advice or professional services. The information provided through The Body should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a disease. It is not a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you may have a health problem, consult your health care provider.