|
|
The Body Covers: The 46th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Comparing the Effects of Rosiglitazone, Pravastatin, Recombinant Human Growth Hormone and Combinations Thereof on HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy
September 30, 2006 Metabolic and morphologic manifestations of HIV and antiretroviral therapy are becoming increasingly common. The physical changes associated with fat loss (lipoatrophy) and fat accumulation (lipohypertrophy) are particularly troublesome for patients. Unfortunately, strategies to deal with these problems are somewhat limited. The best data support switching from stavudine (d4T, Zerit) and possibly zidovudine (AZT, Retrovir) to either abacavir (ABC, Ziagen) or tenofovir (TDF, Viread) to stop or reverse lipoatrophy. Dyslipidemia and glucose dysregulation have also been described in association with HIV and antiretroviral therapy. Since treatment modification is often ineffective or insufficient to reverse some of these manifestations, other interventions have been explored, including the use of insulin-sensitizing agents (e.g., rosiglitazone [Avandia]), recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins; e.g., pravastatin [Pravachol, Pravigard]). The data clearly show that statins can reduce cholesterol while insulin-sensitizing agents often improve glucose levels, but there are conflicting results as to whether these agents influence body composition. In contrast, several case series and randomized controlled trials have shown that r-hGH reduces fat accumulation, particularly in the visceral compartment. However, r-hGH has also been associated with increased insulin resistance and elevated blood glucose levels. The current study from Derek Macallan,1 from the University of London, and colleagues randomized 60 men with HIV-associated lipodystrophy to receive either pravastatin (40 mg/day orally) alone, rosiglitazone (4 mg/day orally) alone or pravastatin + rosiglitazone together for 48 weeks. There were two other study arms that included r-hGH (2 mg/day subcutaneously) alone or with rosiglitazone for 12 weeks. Assessments for this study included dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans every 12 weeks for the measurement of subcutaneous limb fat, abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans for the measurement of visceral fat, and fasting lipid and insulin levels. The primary endpoints included the change from baseline at 24 weeks for each of the assessments. These endpoints were therefore evaluated during ongoing treatment for the pravastatin and rosiglitazone arms and after 12 weeks off therapy for the arms assigned to r-hGH with or without rosiglitazone. This study showed that visceral adiposity was significantly reduced after 12 weeks of r-hGH. However, as previously described, a substantial amount of the visceral fat lost during the treatment phase reaccumulated upon treatment discontinuation. In contrast, none of the other interventions had a significant impact on visceral fat.
The outcome with r-hGH was consistent with many other studies showing a potent lipolytic effect that reduces visceral fat, but that is also associated with some degree of insulin resistance. The ability to attenuate the effect of r-hGH on insulin sensitivity with concomitant rosiglitazone therapy is a novel observation that may be of value if this strategy becomes part of routine care for visceral adiposity. Footnote
This article was provided by The Body PRO. Copyright © Body Health Resources Corporation. All rights reserved.
|