Spring 2006
![]() |
Aptivus is the latest protease inhibitor (PI) to receive FDA approval. For a while, it seemed like dosing problems might derail its development, but the drug's benefits for people with PI-resistant HIV led to a narrowly defined approval in June of 2005.
The effectiveness of this new PI against resistant HIV stemmed from its molecular structure. Whereas all the approved PIs imitated the peptide target of HIV protease, this new compound worked differently. Its structure allowed the drug to bind uniquely with HIV's protease enzyme, so it was not as affected by prior PI resistance mutations. For the many people who had burned through all the older PIs, this offered hope of an effective new drug in the treatment arsenal.
But in human trials, dosing was a problem. In order to achieve adequate drug levels in the body, early studies required eight pills to be taken three times a day with a big meal. At a time when companies were looking for once-a-day drugs with low pill counts, P&J apparently decided that such dosing would limit the drug's market, and in 2000 Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) acquired the rights to develop the drug, now called tipranavir.
BI's first study (BI 1182.2) was problematic, since it started with the hard-fill capsules and switched to the soft-gel version mid-study. In the study, 41 people took either 1200 mg or 2400 mg of tipranavir twice a day along with Sustiva and two NRTIs. Surprisingly, more people on the lower dose achieved a viral load below 50 than those on the higher dose (68% v. 41%). The probable explanation was poor adherence due to the hard fill capsules used at first.
So, BI tried once again to find the elusive best dose of tipranavir, this time using the emerging strategy of boosting PI blood levels with low doses of Norvir (ritonavir). Another dosing study (BI 1182.52) looked at three different twice-daily doses, boosted with Norvir. Each participant took tipranavir with an optimized background regimen based on resistance testing and their treatment history. Over 90% of participants had 10 or more PI mutations, and all had used at least two PIs.
After six months, 40% of people taking 500 mg of tipranavir with 200 mg of Norvir twice a day saw a one log (90%) decrease in their viral load. Since those taking a higher dose (750 mg) had almost the same result (45%), BI decided the 500 mg dose was better. Unfortunately, this meant taking 400 mg of Norvir a day (most boosted PIs use 100 or 200 mg of Norvir a day), leading to more of the side effects that drug is famous for -- 31% of people reported diarrhea and nausea. (Aptivus lowers levels of Norvir in the body, or these numbers might have been worse.) At this dose, 7% of people had elevated liver enzymes, 11% elevated bilirubin, and 27% elevated triglycerides.
Aptivus was approved based on 6 months of data, but we now have results for 11 months: 30.4% of people taking Aptivus achieved viral loads below 400, compared to 13.8% taking another PI. While Aptivus did more than twice as well as other PIs, the low numbers emphasize the need for at least two active agents in a regimen. Twice the number of people who also used Fuzeon (enfuvirtide) -- about 25% of people in the RESIST studies -- achieved a one log (90%) decrease in viral load. (Fuzeon was often the only other drug to which this group was not resistant, and was especially effective in people with viral loads above 100,000, CD4 counts below 75, prior use of more than 13 anti-HIV drugs and more than two resistance mutations.) Nevertheless, anyone who had two or more active drugs in their background regimen did better in these studies than those who didn't. Bottom line: Aptivus works against PI-resistant HIV, but the effect may not last if there are no other active drugs in your regimen.
Since everyone in the RESIST studies was taking a Norvir-boosted PI, it's useful to compare side effect rates, since that gives an idea of which side effects were caused by Aptivus and which by Norvir. Stomach pain, vomiting, fatigue, headache and rash were reported about as often in people taking Aptivus or another PI. Diarrhea was reported more often in those on Aptivus (10.9% compared to 9.4%) as was nausea (6.7% compared to 4.6%). But the most significant concerns were with liver function tests, leading to the warning that is included in the drug's label (see Side Effects, below).
Activists were once again disappointed with Aptivus' price: over $13,000 a year wholesale, making it the highest-priced PI on the market (other than full-dose Norvir, which is virtually never used).
Aptivus' label says that the drug "has been associated with severe liver disease, including some deaths." It recommends that liver function tests should be done before starting Aptivus and "frequently" thereafter. It also advises caution when Aptivus is used by people with elevated liver enzymes or chronic liver diseases like hepatitis B or C, and recommends it not be given to patients with moderate to severe liver disease.
People taking Aptivus are urged to check their cholesterol and triglycerides regularly and to be on the lookout for body shape changes. As with other PIs, Aptivus may worsen or cause diabetes, and people with hemophilia may experience increased bleeding.
FDA Approval: 2005
Manufacturer: Boehringer Ingelheim
Patient Assistance Program: Phone number 1-800-556-8317