Advanced Search >
Home Current Issue Past Issues Reprints Submissions Subscriptions Permissions About Us
Download to Citation Manager   PDF version of this article

Abstract

Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:452-458 © 2006 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Recommendations Regarding Routine Testing for Human Immunodeficiency Virus by an Inpatient Service: Who Are We Missing?

JEFFREY L. GREENWALD, MD; CATHERINE A. RICH, MD; SAMANTHA BESSEGA, MD; MICHAEL A. POSNER, MS; JARED LANE MAEDA, MPH; PAUL R. SKOLNIK, MD 

Individual reprints of this article are not available. Address correspondence to Jeffrey L. Greenwald, MD, Hospital Medicine Unit, Boston Medical Center, 850 Harrison Ave, NIF 6W, Boston, MA 02118 (e-mail: jeffrey.greenwald@bmc.org)

OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion of hospitalized patients who tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by a routine inpatient testing service, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who might not have been identified had routine testing not been offered.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the medical records of patients who tested HIV positive by the inpatient testing service between 1999 and 2003 were compared with the medical records of inpatients who tested HIV negative by the inpatient testing service and the medical records of patients who tested HIV positive in ambulatory settings. We compared HIV risk factors, discharge diagnoses, CD4 cell counts, and HIV RNA concentrations.

RESULTS: A total of 243 patients participated in this study: 81 patients who tested HIV positive and 81 who tested HIV negative by the inpatient testing service, and 81 patients who tested HIV positive in ambulatory settings. Both HIV-positive inpatients and HIV-positive outpatients had similar frequencies of HIV risk factors (46% vs 43%; P=.75). Both groups differed significantly from HIV-negative inpatients (4%; P<.001). Comparing HIV-positive inpatients with HIV-positive outpatients, CD4 cell counts were lower (196 vs 371 cells/mm3; P<.001), and HIV RNA levels were higher (4.61 vs 4.09 log10 HIV RNA; P=.001). At diagnosis, 64 HIV-positive inpatients (79%) met criteria for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome compared with 21 HIV-positive outpatients (26%) (P<.001).

CONCLUSION: Patients who tested HIV positive through inpatient testing have more advanced disease than those identified as outpatients. Half of these patients would not have been identified had testing not been routinely offered. Routine inpatient HIV testing offers an important opportunity to identify patients with HIV infection.

Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(4):452-458

AIDS=acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; CDC=Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; HITS=HIV Inpatient Testing Service; HIV=human immunodeficiency virus; OP positive=outpatient positive 

Full text  |  PDF

Create account

Log in

Journal CME

E-mail Alert

Media request

Click here to submit your manuscript online

MedOpportunities.com

Free Content

Articles older than 6 months are available without registration to all Web site visitors

Learn more

Past Issues

Supplements

Editorial(s)

Letters to the Editor

Residents' Clinic

Medical Images

Art at Mayo Clinic

Historical Profiles of Mayo Clinic

Commencement Address

Stamp Vignette

Book Reviews

Courses and Meetings

Order Forms

Advertising Information

Professional Opportunities

 Article Feeds

Privacy | Contact Us

Terms of use applicable to this site. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use
Copyright ©2001-2008 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. All Rights Reserved.