Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Sign up for free e-mail updates!The Body en Espanol
  • E-mail E-Mail
  • Comments Comments
  • Printer Friendly Printable Single-Page
  • Glossary Glossary
  • Bookmark and Share Share
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention • Policy & Politics

Health Workers' "Conscience" Rule Set to Be Voided

March 9, 2009

The Obama administration recently proposed rescinding a US Health and Human Services regulation that shields health workers who refuse to participate in care they perceive as violating personal, moral or religious beliefs. The proposal will be subject to a 30-day public comment period, officials said.

Finalized in December, the HHS regulation accommodates doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and other health workers who refuse to perform abortion or assist in its provision and other similar services. Federal funding would be cut to state and local governments, hospitals, insurers, clinics, and other entities that do not obey the rule.

The regulation was sought by conservative groups who said health workers were increasingly subject to being fired, disciplined or otherwise penalized for trying to exercise their "right of conscience." The conservative Family Research Council and US Conference of Catholic Bishops, among other groups, condemned the Obama administration's move to rescind the rule.

Advertisement
However, women's health, family-planning, and abortion-rights advocates criticized the old regulation's language as being so broad as to potentially create a major barrier to health services.

"We've been concerned that the way the [Bush era] rule is written, it could make it harder for women to get the care they need," an HHS official said on condition of anonymity. "We recognize and understand that some providers have objections to providing abortions," the official said. "We want to ensure that current law protects them. But the Bush rule goes beyond current law and seems to have upset the balance."

A new rule would be more specific to abortion, the HHS official said. Some predict the new rule would ensure access to care while protecting workers who object to abortion.

Back to other news for March 2009

Search the Newsroom archive

Adapted from:
Washington Post
02.28.2009; Rob Stein

This article was provided by U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It is a part of the publication CDC HIV/Hepatitis/STD/TB Prevention News Update.
  • E-mail E-Mail
  • Comments Comments
  • Printer Friendly Printable Single-Page
  • Glossary Glossary
  • Bookmark and Share Share

See Also
Advocates Urge Obama to Address HIV in the U.S.
President Obama and HIV/AIDS

Reader Comments:

Comment by: Harry Ben Alpha (Sierra Leone, Africa) Sat., Mar. 14, 2009 at 5:42 am EDT
I am totally disappointed by this kind of rule, it is reinforcing the idea that health care workers are not maintain peoples' confidentiality over their health. The new rule we are recommending to pass is NO HEALTH CARE WORKER SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO ENTER ANY SOCIAL,RESTURANTS OR PUBLIC GATHERING BECAUSE THEY DO NOT APPLYING THEIR UNIVERSAL PRECAUTIONS IN TREATMENT OF PATIENTS AS THEY CAN EASILY TRANSFER INFECTIOUS DESEASES. The reason for this rule is that if they are applying universal precautions in treating patients -- they have no rights to talk about morality and religious beliefs. Their responsility as health care workers is to serve anybody accessing health care services.

Comment by: Michael (Haslett, MI) Fri., Mar. 13, 2009 at 1:55 pm EDT
I feel that anyone in the medical field who would not treat a patient for what they want to be treated for because of religious beliefs or any other reason then should not be in the medical field in the first place. They need to quit and find a job where there beliefs will never get in the way of doing their job. Each and every person deserves to be treated by all medical employees in a descent and way they should be treated.

Comment by: Kelly (Las Vegas) Fri., Mar. 13, 2009 at 11:36 am EDT
I was shocked beyond words (although I certainly said a few choice ones in my head) when Bush implemented the "Conscience Rule" and saw it as an attempt to legalize health care discrimination, period. I'm happy to hear that Obama is doing away with it but I don't think we need another "more specific" rule to take its place. Health care workers are supposed to be there to provide "HEALTH CARE" not judgement. If a health care worker is not comfortable with certain procedures then that person should not work at a facility that provides those procedures.

Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Google search results. Be careful when providing personal information!)

Your Name:


Your Location:

(ex: San Francisco, CA)

Your Comment:

Characters remaining:

 

Advertisement