Investigational Vaccine Shows Modest Potential for Protecting Against HIV InfectionSeptember 24, 2009 For the first time, scientists say an investigational vaccine has modest potential for protecting people against HIV infection, the Associated Press reports. "The vaccine -- a combination of two previously unsuccessful vaccines -- cut the risk of becoming infected with HIV by ... 31 percent in the world's largest [HIV] vaccine trial of more than 16,000 volunteers in Thailand, researchers announced Thursday in Bangkok," the news service writes (Marchione/Casey, 9/24). "'It's the first evidence that we could have a safe and effective preventive vaccine,' Colonel Jerome Kim of the U.S. Army," which sponsored the trial, said at a press conference, the Financial Times reports, adding, "Doctors said an actual vaccine was still some way away but the tests provided a valuable 'proof of concept'" (Johnston, 9/24). Other supporters of the trial include the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the Thai Ministry of Public Health "and the patent-holders in the two parts of the vaccine, Sanofi-Pasteur and Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases," the New York Times reports (McNeil, 9/24). For the study, "[t]he researchers enrolled volunteers in Thailand's Chon Buri and Rayong provinces, which have the nation's highest rates of HIV, according to the study Web site," Bloomberg writes. "Subjects were given four doses of the ALVAC vaccine [made by Sanofi-Pasteur] and two of the AIDSVAX shot [made by VaxGen, now owned by Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases] over six months, then monitored for three years. They were also given advice on safe sex" (Bennett, 9/24). "The results were barely significant on statistical grounds, perplexing for scientific reasons and unanticipated by most researchers," the Washington Post writes. "Nevertheless, the first positive results for an [HIV] vaccine after two decades of experimentation was being called a milestone" (Brown, 9/24). Bloomberg continues: "In another finding, the vaccine failed to reduce the amount of virus in the blood of subjects who became infected. Researchers had hoped that if the vaccine didn't prevent infections, it would at least cut the virus to levels so low it couldn't be transmitted. ... The researchers don't understand exactly how the vaccine prevented infections or why it didn't reduce viral load (9/24). "'The study results, representing a significant scientific advance, are the first demonstration that a vaccine can prevent HIV infection in a general adult population and are of great importance,' the Geneva-based World Health Organisation and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) said" in a statement, Reuters writes. "It remains to be seen if the two specific vaccine components in this particular regime would be applicable to other parts of the world with diverse host genetic backgrounds and different HIV subtypes driving different regional sub-epidemics," according to the WHO and UNAIDS, Reuters reports (Nebehay, 9/24). The Telegraph writes, "The researchers have been careful to say the vaccine combination appears to have an effect on the HIV strain circulating in Thailand and it may not work on other strains elsewhere in the world" (Smith/Jamieson, 9/24). The Washington Post includes comments by Anthony Fauci, director of NIAID, who said, "Conceptually, we now know a vaccine is possible. Whether the vaccine is going to look anything like this one I don't know. But at least we know it can be done" (9/24). The New York Times reports, "Fauci said that scientists would seldom consider licensing a vaccine less than 70 or 80 percent effective, but he added, 'If you have a product that's even a little bit protective, you want to look at the blood samples and figure out what particular response was effective and direct research from there'" (9/24). A NIAID press release is available here (9/24). "Mass-producing the vaccine, plus how to proceed with future studies, will be discussed among the governments, study sponsors and companies involved in the trial, Kim said. Scientists want to know how long protection will last, whether booster shots will be needed, and whether the vaccine helps prevent infection in gay men and injection drug users, since it was tested mostly in heterosexuals in the Thai trial," the AP reports (9/24). BBC reports, "'This result is tantalisingly encouraging. The numbers are small and the difference may have been due to chance, but this finding is the first positive news in the AIDS vaccine field for a decade,' said Dr. Richard Horton, editor of the Lancet medical journal. 'We should be cautious, but hopeful. The discovery needs urgent replication and investigation'" (9/24). BERMANA.com reports that the study "will form an important foundation for further HIV vaccine development in Thailand in the future," Paijit Warachit, deputy health permanent secretary in Thailand, said (9/24). The Washington Post adds: "Many details of the trial were not released Wednesday afternoon in briefings to reporters," leading some to some skepticism among health experts. "More information will be presented at an AIDS vaccine meeting in Paris later this fall" (9/24). Science's blog, "Science Insider," also reports on some researchers' skepticism over the results of the clinical trial (Cohen, 9/24). Back to other news for September 2009
This article was provided by Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. It is a part of the publication Kaiser Daily Global Health Policy Report.
Comment by: john
(windhoek namibia, africa)
Wed., Oct. 7, 2009 at 8:29 am EDT great job. i hope it will push up the cure for AIDS
Comment by: adonis
(ibadan NG)
Sat., Sep. 26, 2009 at 7:35 am EDT Good news no doubt,what i dont understand is how it works,were there any controlled exposures of the participants to the virus that will give an objective picture of it effectiveness,what if its only the people infected that were exposed????
Comment by: Phil
(Houston)
Fri., Sep. 25, 2009 at 6:33 am EDT A difference of only 23 people hardly sounds all that significant to me. It's encouraging, but on the surface, it really doesn't pass the smell test.
Comment by: RobertLBC
(Long Beach, Ca)
Thu., Sep. 24, 2009 at 10:18 pm EDT I don't care if 50% became infected. This puts us closer to beating this scourge. Even though I am healthy and live a normal life on Atripla, I grow weary of feeling like a genetic mutant or a modern leper. My dating choices are few being a hetero and most of the available candidates with HIV have some serious baggage. Some who are protected are better than none.
Comment by:
(Boston, MA )
Thu., Sep. 24, 2009 at 9:56 pm EDT I'm sorry, but I don't think that information is impressive at all. Over 100 million dollars and three years of time spent. Why did they use all heterosexuals for the study when homosexuals and iv drug users are the ones most likely to die from AIDS? Out of 8201 people given only placebo, 74 were infected with HIV and out of the 8201 people given the vaccines, 51 were infected. What is the rate of effectiveness here? I'm not sure but if the vaccine WAS effective why didn't it reduce viral load in any of those 51? People interested in more information on HIV and AIDS should type ''does hiv cause aids'' into a search engine and check it out. Controversial but very interesting information can be found from there.
Comment by: Paul
(South Bend, Indiana)
Thu., Sep. 24, 2009 at 6:57 pm EDT I hope that this vaccine pushes forward the cure for HIV/AIDS worldwide. I believe this finding of this study will give encouragement to the researchers to push forward and also for those that provide the money to prevent and cure this virus encouragement to give more money. This is truly wonderful news.
Comment by: Lou
(Ft Lauderdale,Fl)
Thu., Sep. 24, 2009 at 3:53 pm EDT So 125 people in the study out of 16,400 became infected, this is 0.762%. Isnt that too high?
Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Google search results. Be careful when providing personal information!) |
|