Study Looks at Male Circumcision as HIV Prevention Among Black Men in BaltimoreDecember 19, 2008 HIV risk appears to be lower among U.S. black men who have been circumcised and are considered at high risk of contracting the virus than among black men who have not been circumcised, according to a study published on Wednesday in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, Reuters reports. Two other studies in the journal also examine the benefits of male circumcision to prevent the spread of disease and infection. Back to other news for December 2008
This article was provided by Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. It is a part of the publication Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report.
Comment by: Stephan Beaulieu
(New York)
Thu., Jan. 8, 2009 at 7:12 pm EST ...and personally, I think this whole circumcision thing is ridiculous! It seems that amongst gay men it has not been proven to prevent infection for one. It sure hasn't help USAs rate of infection since the beginning of this epidemic and aren't Americans mostly circumcised? How are these studies done? Are uncircumcised heterosexual man just having more sex and therefore increasing their risk? I think this is a scapegoat procedure when we should be focusing on is SAFE SEX!!!! That is the only sure way to prevent transmission of the virus. Let's just hope that with the Bush years behind and moving forward with Obama, that more money and energy will be put into education!!
Comment by: Rosetta
(Buffalo, New York)
Thu., Jan. 8, 2009 at 8:56 am EST Why do we continue to do these types of studies when we already know this...We should be spend the time, effort, and money in education to expecting Moms and legislation making the goverment/HMO's pay for this potiential life saving procedure. I'm tired of the same Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah........Do something with it!
Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Google search results. Be careful when providing personal information!) |