Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
Read Now: Expert Opinions on HIV Cure Research
  
  • Email Email
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

Commentary & Opinion

Science "Cannot Be Bent" to Support Abstinence-Only HIV/AIDS Education, Prevention Initiatives, Opinion Piece Says

September 10, 2004

The U.S. government is carrying out "public health malpractice" in its domestic and global HIV/AIDS prevention initiatives because the Bush administration is using "perverted" science to support its requirements for abstinence-only sex education, Thomas Coates, professor of infectious diseases at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California-Los Angeles and a UCLA AIDS Institute executive committee member, writes in a Baltimore Sun opinion piece. The Bush administration currently requires that nearly one-third, or $270 million, of domestic HIV/AIDS prevention funding focus on abstinence, while recent draft regulations require that any government-funded content that is "vaguely 'sexually suggestive'" be "censor[ed]," Coates writes. In addition, all government-funded sex education materials must include information on the "lack of effectiveness" of condoms, Coates writes. Moreover, the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief requires that one-third of prevention funds go toward abstinence-only and monogamy education initiatives, Coates writes. Although abstinence "should be an option that is provided to everyone so that individuals are not forced to engage in sexual relations when they don't want to," it should "be one option among others" because people "exposed to abstinence-only education are not being given the full range of tools that they need to care for themselves," Coates writes. Science "cannot be bent to support theology-based decisions" concerning HIV/AIDS education and prevention initiatives because if theology is "used to make public health decisions, then the theological thing to do is to act with integrity," Coates writes. The "moral high ground, and any values-based decision, requires that we use the best science we have to protect our young people," Coates concludes (Coates, Baltimore Sun, 9/10).

Back to other news for September 10, 2004


Reprinted with permission from kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/hiv. The Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of the Kaiser Family Foundation, by The Advisory Board Company. © 2004 by The Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.



  
  • Email Email
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

This article was provided by Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. It is a part of the publication Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report. Visit the Kaiser Family Foundation's website to find out more about their activities, publications and services.
 
See Also
More HIV News

Tools
 

Advertisement