The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App 
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
  • Email Email
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

Panel Affirms Importance of Prenatal AZT Use

March, 1997

A note from The field of medicine is constantly evolving. As a result, parts of this article may be outdated. Please keep this in mind, and be sure to visit other parts of our site for more recent information!

In late 1994, results of the NIAID-funded study known as AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 076, showed that the drug AZT dramatically reduces mother-to-infant transmission of HIV when given to HIV positive women during pregnancy and childbirth. Soon thereafter, a Public Health Service (PHS) Task Force and a number of professional organizations recommended that all pregnant women infected with HIV receive AZT. Several recent studies have documented an increase in AZT use during pregnancy and a concomitant decline in HIV transmission from mothers to infants.

Recently, a panel of experts unanimously concluded that these known benefits of AZT far outweigh hypothetical concerns about cancer risk raised by new data from an ongoing study. In that study, researchers from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) found that offspring of mice given massive doses of AZT during pregnancy had a several-fold increased risk for liver and lung tumors. The NIH convened the expert panel to review the NCI data as well as a second study conducted by scientists at Glaxo-Wellcome, Inc., the drug's manufacturer.

The Glaxo researchers also administered AZT to pregnant mice, but in doses that ranged from one-twelfth to one-fiftieth of those used in the NCI study. Still, AZT blood levels of mice in the Glaxo study were three times higher than those seen in pregnant women who receive the drug. In contrast to the NCI study, however, the Glaxo researchers found no increased risk for cancer among offspring of the mice that received AZT during pregnancy. "Both studies appear to be well done," says Jack Killen, M.D., director of NIAID's Division of AIDS (DAIDS). "It is not surprising that they come to different conclusions. The NCI study was designed to maximize the occurrence of transplacental carcinogenesis by giving large doses of the drug over a short period of time during pregnancy. The Glaxo-Wellcome study was designed to examine long-term effects of AZT administered in doses that approximate those used in clinical practice."

After careful consideration of these data, the panel affirmed the importance of pre- and perinatal antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected women. At the same time, the panel strongly emphasized the need for careful long-term follow-up of all children exposed in utero to AZT, including those who are not infected with HIV. The short-term side effects of the AZT regimen used in ACTG 076 have been limited largely to mild, reversible anemia in the infant. No tumors have been observed to date among approximately 1,000 AZT-exposed children followed for an average of three years.

The panel also noted that the state of antiretroviral therapy has changed substantially in the years since the PHS recommendations on the use of AZT during pregnancy were developed and published. "Given the recent advances in combination chemotherapy regimens for HIV infection, a thorough reassessment of the PHS guidelines is needed," says Dr. Killen. The panel recommended that the PHS Task Force should be reconvened to carry out this important task.

A report of the panel's deliberations, titled "Summary of the Meeting of a Panel to Review Studies of Transplacental Toxicity of AZT," is available on the Internet via the NIAID home page at The report may also be obtained from the AIDS Clinical Trials Information Service (ACTIS) at 1-800-874-2572.

Panel Members

Jack Killen, M.D., Chair
Director, Division of AIDS

Arthur J. Ammann, M.D.
Pediatric AIDS Foundation
Novato, Calif.

Ronald Bayer, Ph.D.
Columbia School of Public Health
New York, N.Y.

William A. Blattner, M.D.
Institute of Human Virology
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Md.

Edward Bresnick, Ph.D.
Office of Research
University of Massachusetts
Medical Center
Worcester, Mass.

Jacqueline Clements
Durham, N.C.

Howard Minkoff, M.D.
Health Science Center at Brooklyn
Brooklyn, N.Y.

Eileen Monaghan
Spencerport, N.Y.

Nancy E. Mueller, S.D.
Harvard School of Public Health
Boston, Mass.

June Osborn, M.D.
Macy Foundation
New York, N.Y.

Henry Pitot, M.D., Ph.D.
McArdle Laboratories
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wis.

Jean-Pierre Sommadossi, Ph.D.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Department of Pharmacology
Birmingham, Ala.

Patricia N. Whitley-Williams, M.D.
University of Medicine and Dentistry
of New Jersey
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
New Brunswick, N.J.

Gerald Wogan, Ph.D.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Division of Toxicology
Cambridge, Mass.

A note from The field of medicine is constantly evolving. As a result, parts of this article may be outdated. Please keep this in mind, and be sure to visit other parts of our site for more recent information!

  • Email Email
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

See Also
What Did You Expect While You Were Expecting?
HIV/AIDS Resource Center for Women
More on HIV & Pregnancy