February 11-13, 1997
Contexts That Influence Risk
Important social and biological contexts and cofactors increase or
decrease
the likelihood of risk behaviors. A major contextual influence is the
prevalence
of HIV itself in the local population, which greatly influences the impact
of any risk behavior. Other contextual influences include: individual
factors such as age and developmental stage, early initiation of sexual
behavior, sexual identity, self-esteem, untreated sexually transmitted
diseases,
use of alcohol, and use of other drugs; interpersonal factors such as sex
with a partner of unknown HIV status, partner commitment, and negotiation
of safe sex; social norms and values such as cultural and religious beliefs,
gender role norms, and social inclusion versus marginalization of gay men,
ethnic minorities, people of color, sex workers, women, and drug users;
and political, economic, and health policy factors such as laws and
regulations,
employment opportunities, poverty, sexism, racism, homophobia, and availability
of basic public health tools for protective behavior, such as condoms and
sterile injection equipment.
Although many of the behavioral risk factors are quite well known, the contextual risk factors are only beginning to be understood. For example, intervention programs with younger gay men need to address the fact that some of them consider HIV to be a threat mainly to older men. Negotiation about safe sex practices is much more difficult for women in populations where there are cultural barriers to doing so. Programs targeting sex workers have been highly efficacious in other countries, but in this country would encounter cultural and political barriers. The impact of poverty on seeking treatment for sexually transmitted diseases is much greater in countries without access to universal medical care. These contextual factors combine in dynamic ways to increase behavioral risk.
Means of Identifying Behaviors and Contexts
Behavioral risks have been identified by combining data from epidemiological studies and data from studies of homosexual and heterosexual couples with only one HIV-positive partner. Ongoing measurement of biomedical transmission factors will continue to be important as the epidemic changes. Because contextual factors are more numerous and more difficult to measure than biomedical factors, a wide variety of methods have been used to identify and measure them, including qualitative, ethnographic, and observational techniques. This work is multidisciplinary and requires ongoing consultation with local community groups. Contextual information is essential for designing tailored interventions that respond to the needs and preferences of people in particular communities. In addition, if a particular intervention is not effective for some participants, this information could guide development of the next generation of interventions.
Changing Trends in Specific Behaviors and Community Contexts That Produce Elevated Risk for HIV Infection
A number of established and several new and emerging behaviors and community
contexts increase risk for HIV infection. In general, youth in school are
showing an increase in condom use at last contact, but a trend for decreased
condom use as they get older. Among gay men, the infection rate is increasing
among African-American, Latino, and younger men. Injecting drug users are
at increased risk because of conditions in their communities, including
unavailability of sterile injecting equipment, dealer provision of infected
needles, and social situations that encourage multiperson reuse of needles
and other drug paraphernalia. Women, particularly women of color, recently
increased dramatically as a risk group in the United States and constitute
50 percent of those infected worldwide. Much of the growth in their risk
is caused by sexual contact with partners whose sexual or drug use behavior
put the women at risk. Vertical transmission from infected mother to infant
continues to be a source of high risk for the infant, even with the treatment
for mothers and infants that is now available. In addition, a variety of
other special settings and subpopulations at increased risk, including
incarcerated
youth and adults, and individuals with chronic mental illnesses, deserve
greater attention.