What's So Special About Research? Dr. Carl Dieffenbach Answers
By Candace Y.A. Montague
May 18, 2011
Today is National HIV Vaccine Awareness day. It is a day to recognize the thousands of volunteers who have given their time and bodies for research. It is also a day to spotlight how participation in trials is critical in the pursuit of a cure. Dr. Carl Dieffenbach, Director of the Division of AIDS at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, answered my questions (and questions from others) about clinical trials recruitment and the impact of the failure of FEM-PrEP.
Out of the six current clinical trial networks, which ones do you see the most success with and which ones do you see the greatest deficits?
Each [of the trials] has their own strengths. Therapeutics is focusing on the best first line and second line treatments for HIV. In the past 15 years, we have moved from essentially treatment that was a hand full of pills twice a day to one pill once a day. One pill once a day is very well tolerated and if successfully taken on a regular basis can provide lifelong treatment for the individual. That's pretty amazing. We've made HIV/AIDS, which used to be pretty much a death sentence, to a chronic manageable disease. Globally, we've gone from being able to treat maybe 300,000 people in the world to over five million globally. That never would have happened without those clinical trials. The other area we have focused on is HIV prevention. We have been able to give people the tools to protect themselves. But the fundamental challenge with that is getting people to use them. How do you make it attractive and market it?
Give three specific steps that NIAID intends to take to ensure that future trial design and implementation fosters participation by women, people of color and low-income people in the way of the GRACE study.
The easiest way to get to a specific population is to know what you want and go get it. In order for the data to be relevant to a given population within a clinical trial, we need to hit a target number of those types of people. For example out of 2,000 people we need 750 women. When we get to a point where it looks like we don't need to fill a quota we'll say no more men, only women. We have stopped the enrollment of the easy population and gone after the populations that are difficult to find. Additionally, a protocol starts with a group of people talking about a research question and what we try to do is to ensure that members of the community are at the table when the protocol is being designed. The GRACE study was very good at that.
Low-income people are a population we're extremely proud to serve because we do not require insurance like some trials do. Some trials require you to have insurance to cover the co-meds. We take all comers if they are in a specific group that we are seeking to study and have the disease. Additionally, we have gone to the communities where people of color are. This is an epidemic in the United States of people of color and people of poverty. So we moved our trial sites to those places.
In DC, the last two trials we ran were in the absolute poorest parts of the city. They had incredibly successful enrollment. One [trial] targeted high-risk women and the other was black MSM. We had recruiters who were people who looked like the community and were from the community. We brought them in and trained them. In some ways HIV/AIDS invented this approach.
How does the Fem-PrEP study cancellation impact the NIH funded research on pharmaceutical preventions and interventions?
The answer is that it will stimulate research because I, as a scientist, need to know why it didn't work. We had an evaluation of Truvada in MSM for HIV prevention. One pill once a day doesn't stop transmission. The answer was yes the data was very clear that the more consistent you are the better. So much so that in men who took it consistently the percent of effectiveness was 80-85%. That's a whopping number. That's the kind of thing you want from a vaccine. FEM-PrEP came along, they tried it with the women and stopped it for futility. So we look at the data in the test group and in the control group. You have a dichotomous result. On the face of it, there's a difference between men and women.
Maybe the women didn't take the medication and there's some evidence that they didn't. Is there a biological difference between men and women underneath it all? The answer is I need to know more.
Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)
D.C. HIV/AIDS Examiner
Candace Y.A. Montague
Candace Y.A. Montague has been learning about HIV since 1988 (and she has the certificates from the American Red Cross to prove it). Health is a high priority to Candace because she believes that nothing can come of your life if you're not healthy enough to enjoy it. One of her two master's degrees is in Community Health Promotion and Education. Candace was inspired to act against HIV after seeing a documentary in 2008 about African-American women and HIV. She knew that writing was the best way for her to make a difference and help inform others. Candace is a native Washingtonian and covers HIV news all around D.C. She has covered fundraisers, motorcycle rides, town hall meetings, house balls, Capitol Hill press conferences, election campaigns and protests for The DC Examiner.com and emPower News Magazine.
Subscribe to Candace's Blog:
December 6, 2013 - Three Ways Nelson Mandela Fought AIDS: A Blog Entry by Candace Y.A. Montague
November 25, 2013 - Magic Johnson and Friends Discuss Life and HIV: A Blog Entry by Candace Y.A. Montague
November 5, 2013 - How People With HIV Can Use the Affordable Care Act Website
June 3, 2013 - Michael Douglas, HPV, and Throat Cancer: A Blog Entry by Candace Y.A. Montague
April 5, 2013 - The Sexual Health Lessons of Tyler Perry's Tempation: A Blog Entry by Candace Y.A. Montague
A Brief Disclaimer:
The opinions expressed by TheBody.com's bloggers are entirely their own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of TheBody.com itself.