Policy & Politics
White House Statement Says Obama Would Veto FY11 Budget That "Undermines Critical Priorities or National Security"
February 16, 2011
The Office of Management and Budget released a statement (.pdf) on Tuesday warning that President Barack Obama would "veto the continuing resolution [CR] funding bill now being debated in the House if it contains drastic cuts to national security, but it remains unclear if large cuts in diplomacy and foreign aid programs would be enough to force White House action," Foreign Policy's blog "The Cable" reports.
"If the President is presented with a bill that undermines critical priorities or national security through funding levels or restrictions, contains earmarks, or curtails the drivers of long-term economic growth and job creation while continuing to burden future generations with deficits, the President will veto the bill," according to the statement.
"The White House's policy statement directly criticized the cuts to the Defense Department budget ... But the statement made no reference to the cuts in State Department or foreign aid funding," the blog notes. "In a background conversation with The Cable, an administration official declined to specify whether the cuts to diplomacy and development funding would elicit a presidential veto, but the official did criticize the cuts as unhelpful" (Rogin, 2/15).
On Capitol Hill, more than 400 amendments to Republican leaders' continuing resolution were introduced Monday as a "rare open debate" on the FY 2011 budget continues in Congress this week, The Hill reports.
One measure, introduced by conservative Republican Study Committee Chair Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), would "slash federal funding by an additional $20 billion," according to the publication (Berman, 2/15). Rep. Bob Latta (R-Ohio) has introduced another amendment "to eliminate funding for family planning in the foreign aid budget," according to Politico Pro. "The money is used to aid family planning programs worldwide, including the purchase and distribution of contraceptives," the article reports (Hoskinson, 2/15).
"Lawmakers were expected to file dozens if not hundreds of additional amendments before the deadline on Tuesday, and the House prepared for an around-the-clock debate in a bid to pass the 359-page bill by Thursday," The Hill writes (2/15). The CR would "cut about $60 billion from current [FY10] discretionary spending levels," the National Journal reports, adding that "Republicans are using it to make good on a campaign promise to cut $100 billion in discretionary spending compared with President Obama's fiscal 2011 budget request" (Sanchez, 2/16).
This article was provided by Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. It is a part of the publication Kaiser Daily Global Health Policy Report. Visit the Kaiser Family Foundation's website to find out more about their activities, publications and services.
Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)