Is the National HIV/AIDS Strategy Good for Black Americans? Part 1: Reducing HIV Incidence
By Rod McCullom
August 31, 2010
This is the first in a four-part series examining the strategy's impact on Black communities. This article is cross-posted from the Aug. 31 edition of Black AIDS Weekly, the newsletter of the Black AIDS Institute.
When the Obama administration released the National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS) in July, the activist group Coalition for a National AIDS Strategy described it as "one of the most anticipated moments" in the domestic fight against HIV/AIDS. The four-part plan refocuses resources on the domestic epidemic and prioritizes Black Americans, which means that Black people stand to gain a lot -- at least in theory. Read on to learn how Black folks may be affected by the first part of the plan: reducing new HIV infections.
The Black Community at the Forefront
Blacks represent only about 12 percent of the nation's population but almost half of the more than 56,000 new infections each year. The strategy will "concentrate HIV-prevention efforts at the highest-risk populations," which includes Black Americans, men who have sex with men (MSM) and injection drug users (IDUs). It will also focus attention on the South and Northeast, the areas of the country with the highest HIV rates, and where Blacks are disproportionately located.
"CDC will have better clarity of purpose toward reducing HIV infection within communities that are at the highest risk," says Kevin Fenton, M.D., Ph.D., director of the National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), including more "interventions for the Black community." According to projections, by 2015 the strategy will reduce the annual number of HIV infections by 25 percent -- roughly half of which should theoretically occur among Blacks.
"It's a tall order," says W. Jeffrey Campbell, prevention-development director at the Houston-based St. Hope Foundation, "particularly with the numbers going up the last two years among younger Black MSM. But we need higher goals like that to reach." In 2006 Black gay and bisexual men accounted for one-fifth of new infections nationwide.
Yet some HIV/AIDS advocates have challenged the administration. New York City-based Housing Works calls the NHAS a step backward and asks, "Would President Obama suggest that we only clean up 25 percent of the Gulf oil spill?"
Implementing Interventions That Work
Evidence-based interventions will play an integral role in the plan to reduce new HIV infections. This is a departure from the Bush administration's approach of promoting abstinence, which has proved ineffective.
"It's a great starting point," says Dázon Dixon Diallo, the founder of Atlanta-based SisterLove, the first women's HIV/AIDS service organization in the Southeast. Dixon's organization has been lauded for its community-based risk-reduction strategy. "But I'm concerned it gives short shrift to women's health and reproductive-health issues. That could be very problematic, given the incidence of new cases among Black women."
Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)
Positive Policy is a multi-blogger forum for sharing developments in law, policy and activism relevant to people living with, working in and otherwise affected by HIV/AIDS.
Subscribe to Positive Policy:
May 19, 2014 - 10 Reasons to Address HIV/AIDS in Asian-American and Pacific-Islander Communities
April 4, 2013 - Patient Navigators: Ending the Epidemic -- A Blog Entry by Paul A. Kawata
March 26, 2013 - This Is a Huge Week for LGBT Equality! A Blog Entry in Positive Policy
November 1, 2012 - Vote Tuesday! Make Sure the HIV/AIDS Community Is Heard! A Blog Entry by Paul Kawata
October 9, 2012 - Damned If You Don't: A Blog Entry in Positive Policy
A Brief Disclaimer:
The opinions expressed by TheBody.com's bloggers are entirely their own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of TheBody.com itself.