The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter 
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
  • Email Email
  • Comments Comments
  •  (7)
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

U.S. News

Steep Drop in Circumcision in U.S.

August 17, 2010

A study by CDC researchers on rates of adverse events related to infant male circumcision in the United States has stirred debate on the Internet about the cultural and health values of the procedure.

Presented last month at the 18th International AIDS Conference, the retrospective study used hospital discharge data from SDI Health, the largest U.S. consolidator of electronic health care reimbursement claims. It found a low incidence of adverse events from neonatal male circumcision. While the study was not designed to analyze U.S. circumcision rates, the SDI data are being incorporated into the larger debate about male circumcision in the United States.

A slide from the study indicated that SDI data showed neonatal male circumcision rates falling from 56 percent in 2006 to 32.5 percent in 2009. The data do not include procedures outside of hospitals, such as Jewish ritual circumcisions, or circumcisions not covered by health insurance.

"Word has gotten out that it's not necessary, it's harmful and it's painful," said Georganne Chapin, executive director of the New York-based non-profit Intact America. Increased attention to so-called female circumcision has also been a factor. "How can you think it's OK to cut little boys, when you are horrified by the idea of cutting little girls?" Chapin asked.

CDC was not involved in the collection of the data, "nor has CDC undertaken any review of this particular data for the purpose of calculating rates," said Elizabeth-Ann Chandler, an agency spokesperson. "As such, we cannot comment on the accuracy of this particular estimate of infant male circumcision."

CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics are reviewing scientific data in advance of issuing new policy recommendations. AAP is likely to move from a neutral stance to a more encouraging one on circumcision, which has health benefits beyond HIV prevention, said Dr. Michael Brady, who served on the AAP task force.

Studies in Africa have shown male circumcision reduces the risk of female-to-male HIV transmission by up to 60 percent.

Back to other news for August 2010

Adapted from:
New York Times
08.17.2010; Roni Caryn Rabin

  • Email Email
  • Comments Comments
  •  (7)
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

This article was provided by CDC National Prevention Information Network. It is a part of the publication CDC HIV/Hepatitis/STD/TB Prevention News Update.
See Also
Quiz: Are You at Risk for HIV?
10 Common Fears About HIV Transmission
Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention


Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read's Comment Policy.)

Your Name:

Your Location:

(ex: San Francisco, CA)

Your Comment:

Characters remaining: