A South African tribal king in a province where one in seven residents are HIV-positive is promoting circumcision to help protect his people from the epidemic.
"I don't want to lose any of my Zulu people," explained King Goodwill Zwelithini. In KwaZulu-Natal province, about 350 people are infected with HIV every day and another 320 die from the complications of AIDS.
African studies have shown that male circumcision reduces the risk of female-to-male HIV transmission by 60 percent.
In promoting circumcision, Zwelithini, with the support of the provincial Health Minister Dr. Sibongiseni Dhlomo, is reviving a long-standing tradition among Zulu men. The king and public health officials are careful to note that circumcision does not provide absolute protection, so other measures, such as wearing condoms, must be used as well.View Full Article
Comment by: Hugh7
Sat., Jul. 3, 2010 at 7:41 pm UTC
"60 percent" risk reduction is hype. That is a relative risk reduction, the ratio of the difference between two small figures. (From 2.5% to 1.2%). The absolute figures are that less than two years after circumcising 5,400 men in South Africa, Kenya and Uganda, 64 circumcised men contracted HIV, and 137 of a similar number not circumcised. The difference, 73 men, is the TOTAL basis of the claim that "circumcision could protect millions".
327 circumcised men dropped out of the studies, their HIV status unknown, easily enough to conceal enough extra HIV+ men to make it statistically insignificant.
And a study by Maria Wawer et al. in Uganda found 18% of the woman partners of circumcised HIV+ men became HIV+, compared with only 12% of the partners of non-circumcised HIV+ men. That study was stopped "for futility" before the figures could reach statistical significance. (There would have been no ethical objection to allowing the study to run, because they had established that circumcising the control group would not protect the women.)
So encouraging men to have themselves circumcised may actually increase the risk of passing HIV on to their partners.
Comment by: Mark Lyndon
Fri., Jul. 2, 2010 at 9:17 pm UTC
Circumcision is a dangerous distraction in the fight against AIDS. There are six African countries where men are *more* likely to be HIV+ if they've been circumcised: Cameroon, Ghana, Lesotho, Malawi, Rwanda, and Swaziland. Eg in Malawi, the HIV rate is 13.2% among circumcised men, but only 9.5% among intact men. In Rwanda, the HIV rate is 3.5% among circumcised men, but only 2.1% among intact men. If circumcision really worked against AIDS, this just wouldn't happen. We now have people calling circumcision a "vaccine" or "invisible condom", and viewing circumcision as an alternative to condoms. The South African National Communication Survey on HIV/AIDS, 2009 found that 15% of adults across age groups "believe that circumcised men do not need to use condoms".
The one randomized controlled trial into male-to-female transmission showed a 54% higher rate in the group where the men had been circumcised btw.
ABC (Abstinence, Being faithful, Condoms) is the way forward. Promoting genital surgery will cost African lives, not save them.
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy