|
International News N.Y. Times Examines Debate Over U.S. Global Health Spending PrioritiesOctober 30, 2009 The New York Times examines the "debate over whether the United States and other rich nations spend too much on AIDS, which requires lifelong medications, compared with diarrhea and the other leading killer of children, pneumonia, both of which can be treated inexpensively." According to the newspaper, "[d]iarrhea kills 1.5 million young children a year in developing countries -- more than AIDS, malaria and measles combined -- but only 4 in 10 of those who need the oral rehydration solution that can prevent death for pennies get it." The global economic downturn has led to "heightened competition for foreign assistance," and though President Barack Obama has proposed a 2 percent increase in spending on HIV and AIDS for 2010 and a 6 percent rise for maternal and child health, according to the Global Health Council [GHC] ... the disparity in American spending on AIDS and the big child killers remains stark," the New York Times reports. GHC also estimates Obama has proposed a "53 percent increase next year" for the President's Malaria Initiative "to fight ... a major killer of African children." While international commitments to fight HIV/AIDS increased annually at an average rate of 48 percent between 1998 and 2007, according to Syracuse University's Jeremy Shiffman, "more than half the people with the disease who need drug treatment still are not getting it," the New York Times reports, adding, "[t]he toll of women and children who die of easily preventable or curable conditions is even higher. Pneumonia alone killed 2 million children under age 5 ... out of the almost 9 million young children who died last year." Back to other news for October 2009
This article was provided by Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. It is a part of the publication Kaiser Daily Global Health Policy Report.
|
|