Migration and HIV in Africa: Challenges and RecommendationsApril 2008 Increasingly, global responses to migration and to migrants are influencing responses to the HIV/AIDS epidemic itself. African migrants in particular have borne the brunt of xenophobia and discrimination directed toward outsiders. Those who are undocumented have little or no legal protections and limited access to basic health and social services that are fundamental to successful integration into a foreign environment. These barriers, coupled with the complex social, behavior and psychological dynamics of migrancy form a constellation of risk factors that heightens vulnerability for contracting HIV/AIDS. The African population has always been extremely mobile. Pre-colonial migratory patterns occurred without barriers or legal restraint, driven by agricultural resources, trade and labor. Similarly, in the post-colonial period migration has become a vehicle for economic betterment as well as an escape valve to overwhelming tensions caused by displacement, conflict, poverty, and resource deprivation. Today, international labor migration is commonplace. According to the International Labor Organization (ILO), over 20 million African men and women are migrant workers and the World Bank reports that remittances by Africans working aboard now account for a substantial portion of the gross domestic product of Lesotho, Senegal, Uganda and Nigeria. In spite of the critical role they play in the economic development of their adoptive countries, these workers are, at best, treated as second class citizens. The international community has sought ways of achieving justice via the creation of international migrant worker rights conventions, including the Migration for Employment Convention (Revised) of 1949; the Migrant Workers (Supplementary Provisions) Convention of 1975; and the United Nations Convention on the Protection of the Rights of Migrant workers and their Families, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1990. These legal instruments created principles for the establishment of national laws and judicial and administrative procedures related to human rights (such as equal treatment in employment, social security, non-discrimination and anti-trafficking activities). It is important to note that the US and most of western European countries that receive migrant workers have yet to ratify or adopt any international convention protecting their rights. In many African countries, regulatory frameworks are being revised with the objective of integrating HIV/AIDS-related human rights principles into a national legal fabric. Some countries are going as far as drafting provisions in the law that clearly stipulate that HIV positive people entering or returning will enjoy the same rights as non-infected persons, reaffirming that one's HIV status will have no bearing on the right of entry, freedom of movement or freedom to work. For example, the economically integrated regional trading blocs in Africa, known as the Regional Economic Communities (RECs), have subscribed to the commitments laid out in the 2001 United Nations General Assembly Special Session on HIV/AIDS Declaration. The declaration stipulates that RECs should develop and implement strategies that incorporate HIV/AIDS awareness, prevention, care and treatment into emergency response and national assistance programs that target refugees, internally displaced persons, and migrants. It is within this context that some African countries, already overburdened with the HIV/AIDS epidemic of their own nationals, have restructured their health systems so as to benefit foreign migrants by providing free HIV/AIDS-related medical services. Governments have an obligation to assure that human rights are protected for all people, irrespective of HIV status. As such, a strategic conscious-raising and advocacy campaign needs to be undertaken to change worldwide perception on migrant populations. Restrictions imposed on travel, entry and procedures related to immigration and asylum based on one's HIV/AIDS status are a violation of the right to equality of treatment before the law. National governments have an obligation to ensure that such rights do not disappear once a migrant leaves his or her country of origin. Want to read more articles in the April 2008 issue of GMHC Treatment Issues? Click here. This article was provided by Gay Men's Health Crisis. It is a part of the publication GMHC Treatment Issues. Visit GMHC's website to find out more about their activities, publications and services.
|
|