Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
Read Now: TheBodyPRO.com Covers AIDS 2014
  
  • Email Email
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

Commentary & Opinion

Editorial, Letter to Editor Respond to Obama's Proposed $63 Billion Global Health Initiative

May 11, 2009

Two newspapers recently published an editorial and letter to the editor in response to President Obama's $63 billion, six-year global health initiative. Obama's plan calls for the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief to receive $51 billion over six years to fight HIV, tuberculosis and malaria, while the remaining $12 billion would be directed to other global health issues, including pre- and post-natal care and child health initiatives. Obama's proposal would increase FY 2010 spending on global HIV, TB and malaria to $7.4 billion, $366 million more than this year (Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report, 5/6). Summaries appear below.

Editorial

  • Boston Globe: The proposal "would break new ground in treating children's infectious diseases, even as it falls short of campaign promises for major increases in overseas funding for HIV/AIDS," the editorial says. Although HIV/AIDS advocates have "criticized" the proposal, the U.S. "can save more lives for less money in developing countries by broadening its health safety net," according to the editorial. Obama's plan is an "overdue acknowledgement that [developing] nations need assistance in addressing a raft of diseases and health threats," the editorial says, adding that the "differences between the president's campaign pledges and last week's proposal will pale in significance if Congress reacts to the mounting budget deficits by throwing a brake on foreign aid." The editorial concludes that "[a]ll advocates of U.S. global health spending should rally around the Obama plan, to make sure that Americans' commitment to prevent and treat deadly diseases overseas does not fall victim to the ebb and flow of the world's economy" (Boston Globe, 5/11).

Letter to the Editor

  • Eric Friedman, New York Times: Although Obama's proposed increases in global health spending that is not related to HIV/AIDS is "welcome," it "fall[s] far short of the investments required to achieve the United Nations Millennium Development Goals despite the president's express commitment to them," Friedman, senior global health policy adviser at Physicians for Human Rights, writes in a letter to the editor of the Times. "As the economic downturn forces the administration to rethink priorities, global health must not -- and in a multitrillion-dollar budget need not -- lose out," Friedman writes, adding that if the U.S. "fails to make the necessary investments in global health, there will be needless, avoidable and extensive loss of life." Friedman concludes, "Fiscal responsibility cannot and should not be restored at the expense of the health of the world's poorest and most marginalized citizens" (Friedman, New York Times, 5/10).

Back to other news for May 2009

Advertisement


Reprinted with permission from kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/hiv. The Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of the Kaiser Family Foundation, by The Advisory Board Company. © 2009 by The Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.



  
  • Email Email
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

This article was provided by Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. It is a part of the publication Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report. Visit the Kaiser Family Foundation's website to find out more about their activities, publications and services.
 
See Also
Advocates Urge Obama to Address HIV in the U.S.
President Obama and HIV/AIDS

Tools
 

Advertisement