Project Inform Community Alert
ABT-378 Reaches Expanded Access Program
Experimental Drug Combinations
Experimental Dosing Schemes with Protease Inhibitors
The notion of simple drug holidays -- taking a weekend or day off here and there -- is as much a bad idea today as it ever was. Repeated, short-term drug holidays will greatly increase the chances of developing resistance to anti-HIV drugs. In short, those who want to live long and healthy lives should avoid short little drug holidays.
So what is the scientific discussion about? Researchers are talking about structured interruptions of therapy. This means that the effort to stop treatment is part of a plan, with a goal in mind, not a matter of whimsy or personal convenience. Three general hypotheses will soon be tested. All call for interrupting therapy for a specific length of time, at a pre-planned point in time, in hopes of achieving a particular treatment goal.
In one hypothesis, researchers hope to determine if cycling people on and off therapy according to a set of rules might trigger a stronger immune response against HIV, and over time, make a person less dependent upon drugs to control viral load. A second hypothesis asks whether months-long interruptions in therapy might overcome drug resistance. The third hypothesis simply asks whether people suffering from serious side effects or severe drug weariness might give their bodies a rest from therapy without doing more harm than good. For now, there are no hard answers to these questions, only a few crumbs of intriguing data from small, short studies.
The Promise?Project Inform, working with New York's Treatment Action Group, Los Angeles-based Foundation for AIDS and Immune Research and an international team of researchers, will do everything in our power to get answers as quickly as possible. We are jointly sponsoring an international scientific meeting at the end of July to help coordinate research on treatment interruption. We will share information as soon as it becomes available and continue to work as advocates, making sure the research gets done as well and as soon as it can.
According to the manufacturer, the program will serve only a few hundred people in the US because of limited drug supplies. First priority will be given to people who have fewer than 50 CD4+ cells and/or an active opportunistic infection. Second priority, supply permitting, will be for people with CD4+ counts between 50 and 100. Third priority, supply permitting, will be for people with CD4+ counts between 100 and 200. A much larger expanded access program will extend availability of the drug to more people in early 2000. Because of the limited size of the program beginning in September, it's important to apply as soon as possible. Those interested should call Project Inform's National HIV/AIDS Treatment Hotline at 1-800-822-7422 for information.
ABT-378 is also available through clinical studies. Abbott reports many slots are still available, primarily for people who have failed only a single protease inhibitor and who have not yet used a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (delavirdine, efavirenz or nevirapine).
Why Consider These Combinations?The most common reason for exploring these combinations is to construct effective regimens for people who are no longer responding to proven first and second line combinations. Some studies of third line therapy involve up to seven drugs, including drugs of every class.
Another motivation is to simplify drug dosing. Sometimes, combining two protease inhibitors may increase the blood levels of one or both drugs, thus reducing the number of pills needed, the number of times a day drugs are taken, or changing the associated food restrictions associated. This only works well with certain combinations, such as ritonavir plus saquinavir or indinavir. Combining some drugs often offers no advantages: it simply increases the number of pills a person must take. While using novel combinations to simplify regimens is an important goal for some people, limited data are available on how to best do this. Patients and doctors need to be well informed, lest they do more harm than good.
Another motivation for experimental combinations is to increase the overall potency of the regimen. The effect of combining the "right" drugs can be much greater than what would be expected from simply adding another drug. Some people seeking the strongest possible anti-HIV regimen may use all three classes of drugs. This approach runs the potential risk of using up options too quickly. If a person experiences viral breakthrough while on a regimen that includes all classes of drugs, s/he could develop resistance to any and all classes of drugs, thus greatly limiting future options.
For more detailed information on anti-HIV drug interactions, contact Project Inform's toll-free National HIV/AIDS Treatment Hotline at 1-800-822-7422 and request the Drug Interactions Fact Sheet.
This article was provided by Project Inform. Visit Project Inform's website to find out more about their activities, publications and services.