Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
Read Now: TheBodyPRO.com Covers AIDS 2014
TheBody.com/The Body PRO Covers The 48th Annual ICAAC/IDSA 46th Annual Meeting
  
  • Email Email
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

Study Shows Better Results From Vicriviroc When New Trofile Test Is Used

October 26, 2008

A study presented at the joint 2008 ICAAC/IDSA in Washington, DC found the second generation Trofile test is better at predicting the success of Schering-Plough's experimental CCR5 drug, vicriviroc.

The study was a re-analysis of the ACTC 5211 study, which compared vicriviroc to placebo, each taken with optimized background therapy (OBT) in people with experience taking HIV treatments. The original study used the first generation Trofile test, done by Monogram Biosciences, to assess whether the volunteers' HIV used only CCR5 (R5) to enter cells, or if it could use another co-receptor called CXCR4 (X4).

This enhanced Trofile test -- also from Monogram -- has been shown in other research to be better able to detect smaller amounts of HIV that uses X4. The researchers wanted to see if it would better predict whether a person was likely to experience benefit from taking vicriviroc compared to the first generation test.

Advertisement
Overall, the enhanced test found 25 more cases of X4 HIV, out of 114 samples that had originally tested R5 only. Of those 25, 15 had been randomized to take vicriviroc, with 12 experiencing early treatment failure. This suggests that the new test is indeed more accurate at predicting whether people are likely to benefit from vicriviroc, and probably any other R5 drug, like Selzentry (maraviroc).

An audience member pointed out an important potential weakness of this analysis. The researchers did not assess what, if any, affect the other drugs used in the study had in the proportion of people with undetectable HIV. It could be that most of the added benefit thought to be from the more sensitive test was really from other drugs being used in the OBT.

While this new test is better able to detect small amounts of X4 HIV, some HIV doctors and researchers are not altogether convinced that this is a good thing. One Selzentry study found higher CD4 counts in people with X4 HIV despite no reductions in HIV levels. Most doctors and some insurers are requiring the Trofile test to show R5-only HIV in order for Selzentry to be used. Some fear that this new, more sensitive test will further restrict use of this new class of drugs from people who could theoretically benefit from it.

It is important to emphasize that any benefit from a R5 drug even without reducing HIV levels is theoretical. While it was seen in one study, there are several potential reasons for the finding. It's also important to note the study included a small number of people, and it has not been reproduced by others.

For now, this study only shows that the enhanced Trofile test is better at predicting benefit from vicriviroc, and presumably Selzentry. Use of this more sensitive test in the further development of vicriviroc -- and other R5 drugs -- may lead to better treatment outcomes for study volunteers.


  
  • Email Email
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

This article was provided by Project Inform. Visit Project Inform's website to find out more about their activities, publications and services.
 
See Also
ICAAC/IDSA 2008 Newsroom



Please note: Knowledge about HIV changes rapidly. Note the date of this summary's publication, and before treating patients or employing any therapies described in these materials, verify all information independently. If you are a patient, please consult a doctor or other medical professional before acting on any of the information presented in this summary. For a complete listing of our most recent conference coverage, click here.

Advertisement