By Richard E. Chaisson, M.D.
Prevention of opportunistic infections remains a critically important management strategy for patients with HIV disease. Guidelines published last year by the US Public Health Service/Infectious Disease Society of America Working Group categorized prophylaxis options into three groups. Category I are those treatments recognized as the standard of care for all eligible patients; in other words, not to use these treatments constitutes a breach of professional standards. Category II includes treatments that should be strongly considered for all eligible patients, but not to offer these therapies would not constitute substandard care. Category III includes treatments that may be considered for selected patients, but there is no mandate to use or even consider these options as standard therapies. The major
considerations that led to the categorizations were incidence of disease, efficacy of prophylaxis, impact on survival and cost.
Since publication of these guidelines there have been two important advances in prophylaxis. First, prophylaxis for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) has been shown to prolong survival, and the macrolides clarithromycin and azithromycin have been found to be superior to rifabutin. Most authorities now agree that prophylaxis of MAC for patients with CD4 counts <75 should be the standard of care. Second, prophylaxis of CMV disease with oral ganciclovir has been shown to be highly efficacious, with a 50 percent reduction in the risk of retinitis and other serious forms of CMV disease. Oral ganciclovir did not significantly prolong survival, and the dosage form (12 pills per day) and cost of this therapy (~$14,000 per year) make its routine use problematic. Most experts now agree,
however, that CMV prophylaxis should be considered for patients who are CMV seropositive and have CD4 counts <50. Use of CMV DNA PCR assays may help further target patients at high risk of CMV disease.
Below is an updated summary of the USPHS/IDSA guidelines, with alternatives for the first line treatments. It is likely that this document will be amended to make MAC a Category I disease and CMV a Category II disease.
AdvertisementTables are reprinted from Chaisson, RE, 6th Annual Clinical Care Options for HIV Symposium, Opportunistic Infections: Impact on the Natural History of HIV Infection. May 2-5, 1996, Section 5. Adapted from MMWR 1995; 44(RR-8):1-10.
| Table 1
|
PROPHYLAXIS OF FIRST EPISODE OF OPPORTUNISTIC DISEASES IN HIV-INFECTED ADULTS: STRONGLY RECOMMENDED AS STANDARD OF CARE
|
| | PREVENTIVE REGIMENS
|
| PATHOGEN | INDICATION | FIRST CHOICE | ALTERNATIVES
|
| Pneumocystis carinii
|
- CD4+ < 200 cells/mm3 or < 14%
- unexplained fever for >= 2 weeks
- oropharyngeal candidiasis
|
|
- TMP-SMX 1 SS PO qd or 1 DS PO tiw
- dapsone 50 mg PO bid or 100 mg PO qd
- dapsone 50 mg PO qd, plus pyrimethamine 50 mg PO qw, plus leucovorin 25 mg PO qw,
- dapsone 200 mg PO qw, plus pyrimethamine 75 mg PO qw, plus leucovorin 25 mg PO qw
- aerosolized pentamidine 300 mg qm via Respirgard II nebulizer
|
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Isoniazid- sensitive
|
- TST reaction of >= 5 mm or prior positive TST result with treatment or contact with case of active tuberculosis
|
- isoniazid 300 mg PO, plus pyridoxine 50 mg PO qd x 12 months
- isoniazid 900 mg PO, plus pyridoxine 50 mg PO biw x 12 months
|
- rifampin 600 mg PO qd x 12 months
|
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Isoniazid- resistant
|
- same as above, high probability of exposure to isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis
|
- rifampin 600 mg PO qd x 12 months
|
- rifabutin 300 mg PO qd x 12 months
|
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Multidrug- resistant (isoniazid and rifampin)
|
- same as above, high probability of exposure to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
|
- choice of drugs requires consultation with public health authorities
|
|
| Toxplasma gondii
|
- IgG antibody to toxoplasma and CD4+ < 100 cells/mm3
|
|
- TMP-SMX 1 SS PO qd or 1 DS PO tiw
- dapsone 50 mg PO qd, plus pyrimethamine 50 mg PO qw, plus leucovorin 25 mg PO qw
|
| Adapted from USPHA/IDSA guidelines for the prevention of opportunistic infections in persons with HIV: A summary. MMWR 1995;44 (RR-8):1-10.
|
| Table 3
|
PROPHYLAXIS OF FIRST EPISODE
OF OPPORTUNISTIC DISEASES IN HIV-INFECTED ADULTS:
INDICATED FOR CONSIDERATION IN SELECTED PATIENTS
|
| | PREVENTIVE REGIMENS
|
| PATHOGEN | INDICATION | FIRST CHOICE | ALTERNATIVES
|
| Bacteria
|
- neutropenia stimulating factor 5-10 µg/kg sc qd x 2-4 w; or granulocyte macrophage- colony stimulating factor 250 µg/m2 over 2 h qd x 2-4 w
|
|
|
| Candida species
|
|
|
- ketoconazole 200 mg PO qd
|
| Cryptococcus neoformans
|
|
|
|
| Histoplasma capsulatum
|
- CD4+ <50 cells/mm3, endemic geographic area
|
|
|
| Coccidiodes immitis
|
- CD4+ <50 cells/mm3, endemic geographic region
|
|
- itraconazole 200 mg PO qd
|
| CMV
|
- CD4+ <50 cells/mm3, CMV antibody positivity
|
|
- valaciclovir 2 g qid (prevents CMV but may hasten death)
|
| Unknown (herpesviruses)?
|
|
|
|
| Hepatitis B virus
|
- all susceptible (anti-HBc-negative) patients
|
- Energix-B, 20 µg IMx3
- Recombivax HB, 10 µg IMx3
|
|
| Influenza virus
|
- all patients (annually, before influenza season)
|
- whole or split virus, 0.5 mL im/y
|
- rimantadine 200 mg PO bid
|
| Herpes simplex virus
|
- any CD4+ cell count
- history of recurrences <= every 6 weeks
|
- acyclovir 400 - 800 mg PO bid
|
|
| Adapted from USPHA/IDSA guidelines for the prevention of opportunistic infections in persons with HIV: A summary. MMWR 1995;44 (RR-8):1-10.
|
.