Interleukin-2 (IL-2, Proleukin)
A man-made version of IL-2 (aldesleukin, Proleukin) has been studied for over 20 years in HIV-positive people as a way to increase the number of CD4+ cells. It is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating other conditions, though some people living with HIV have found ways to make it part of their overall treatment strategy. Whether or not IL-2 therapy helps people with HIV to live longer or preserves their ability to fight infections is the subject of two large international studies.
CD4+ cells are central to managing your body's response to infections. In HIV disease, these cells become infected with HIV and eventually die or begin to function improperly. Over time, as the total number of these cells declines and their functions fail, the immune system gradually weakens and loses its ability to fight disease.
IL-2 stimulates CD4+ cells to become active and reproduce. This can help restore or maintain a normal number of CD4+ cells and might also improve their function.
Experimental formulas of IL-2 have been tried and more are being studied. Large studies are underway to evaluate a cycled strategy of twice a day subQ IL-2 injections, at doses of 9 MIU (4.5 twice a day) or 15 MIU (7.5 twice a day), for 5 consecutive days, every 2 months. This approach is effective in producing large increases in the number of CD4+ cells. Increases of 100?400 or more CD4+ cells have been routinely achieved, beyond the improvements seen from standard anti-HIV therapies.
In lab research, IL-2 is often used to stimulate HIV-infected cells to reproduce. When IL-2 is used this way, it causes the infected cells to produce large amounts of new HIV particles. Because of this, some researchers feared using the drug in humans, where they certainly don't want to see increased production of HIV. However, these fears have not been seen in studies.
To the contrary, changes in HIV levels are similar among groups taking IL-2 together with anti-HIV therapy compared to those on anti-HIV therapy alone. After a course of IL-2, there is often a burst of HIV activity, but it's not sustained and there's no evidence that these temporary elevations in HIV levels cause harm. Nonetheless, this concern causes most researchers to use IL-2 only in people using anti-HIV therapies.
Researchers tailor IL-2 dosing and scheduling to fit the individual's needs -- trying to optimize CD4+ cell count increases and minimize side effects. If side effects occur, doses are reduced and/or courses are shortened to improve tolerability. If CD4+ cell counts rise to normal ranges, therapy is given less often to maintain those increases. So far in studies, people who started IL-2 therapy while CD4+ cell counts were high (above 400) generally had more immediate and pronounced increases in CD4+ cell counts, resulting in the need for less frequent IL-2 therapy.
One study at the National Institutes of Health included people with CD4+ cell counts around 600. Within the first three cycles, IL-2 recipients experienced CD4+ cell count increases to about 1,200. The average time between cycles that kept CD4+ cell counts at this level was about one year. However, if CD4+ cell counts are below 300 when IL-2 is started, then CD4+ cell count increases are usually less immediate and pronounced. Therefore, to maintain ideal CD4+ cell counts in such people, a much longer time on bi-monthly IL-2 cycles may be required before the period between cycles can be extended.
Using IL-2 as part of structured treatment interruptions (STIs) has also received attention. This is discussed briefly in Project Inform's publication, Strategies for Attempting Structured Therapy Interruptions.
A few completed studies looked at using IL-2 as part of an eradication strategy. So far, they have not shown that completely removing HIV from a person's body is possible -- with or without IL-2.
Studies of low dose daily injections of IL-2 have not resulted in the dramatic CD4+ cell increases seen with the higher dose cycle, although this approach may cause fewer side effects. Following less than remarkable results from a moderately sized study, the company developing IL-2 at that time (Chiron Corporation) stopped major development efforts on low dose IL-2. Nonetheless, some individuals and doctors still experiment with this approach, hoping to find an ideal balance between potential benefits and known side effects.
Finally, a moderate size study in people with very low CD4+ cell counts (below 200) and controlled HIV replication (below 1,000 copies HIV RNA) showed that IL-2 therapy could lead to modest increases in CD4+ cell counts. Results have led the French regulatory agency to approve a Compassionate Use Program for IL-2 for people with low CD4+ cell counts and HIV levels below 1,000. These data, combined with other study results, provided French authorities with enough confidence to make IL-2 more widely available to people with more advanced-stage HIV disease. The FDA in the US has taken a more conservative approach and has not approved access to IL-2 in the same way. Despite this, some people in the US manage to get IL-2; since once a drug is approved by the FDA, doctors have the right to use it however they choose. However, private insurance and other payers may not be willing to pay for the drug.
Studies suggest that IL-2 therapy can be used safely (though with significant side effects) by people at all levels of CD4+ cell counts. IL-2 provides the greatest increases in CD4+ counts when it is used together with anti-HIV therapy. The most pronounced and immediate increases in CD4+ cell counts are seen among people who start IL-2 therapy together with anti-HIV therapy while their CD4+ cell counts are above 300, and preferably when their lowest ever CD4+ cell count (nadir count) has never been below 200.
There are several situations in which IL-2 therapy should be avoided or approached with extreme caution. As a general rule, it is discouraged for people with high detectable viral loads, since IL-2 can at least temporarily cause the viral load to increase even more. Some doctors urge caution using IL-2 in anyone who has a detectable viral load at all. However, this strict position seems unnecessary to others, since all early studies of IL-2 that showed benefit were conducted before potent three-drug anti-HIV therapy made it possible to reduce viral load to undetectable levels.
People with an active infection (e.g. opportunistic infection) should avoid IL-2 or use it carefully. IL-2 can produce temporary immune suppressive effects. Therefore, anyone with an infection should wait until the condition has resolved before using IL-2.
This also applies to people currently on an IL-2 regimen. If you have an infection, consider waiting until it's resolved before starting your next IL-2 cycle. If you're taking IL-2 and develop an infection, delay IL-2 therapy until it's resolved.
People with heart problems should also be cautious since IL-2 decreases blood pressure. People on medicine to lower blood pressure should consider either avoiding IL-2 therapy or consider stopping blood pressure medication, in consultation with a doctor, during the five-day courses of IL-2. The combination of IL-2 with blood pressure lowering medication could result in dangerously low blood pressure levels that could be fatal.
IL-2 should not be used by people with lung disease. People with autoimmune diseases, including Crohn's disease, psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis should not use IL-2, or use it with great caution because it may worsen these conditions. There are concerns that IL-2 therapy might also worsen diabetes, so people with diabetes and people with signs of insulin resistance should be cautious. Because IL-2 side effects include flu-like symptoms, including fatigue, people experiencing extreme fatigue are encouraged to seek treatment for its cause and delay IL-2 therapy until the condition has resolved. In rare instances, IL-2 has caused hypothyroidism and thus should not be used by people with thyroid problems.
Pregnant Women and ChildrenIL-2 has not been studied in pregnant women. In studies, women who become pregnant must stop IL-2 but can remain in the study. IL-2 can raise bilirubin levels which may cause serious harm to the developing child. Studies of IL-2 in children are ongoing.
Unlike anti-HIV therapy where only a relatively small percentage of people may experience a particular side effect, flu-like symptoms are both predictable and expected among the vast majority of IL-2 users. This side effect may be lessened by taking antihistamines and ibuprofen before taking IL-2. (NOTE: Some antihistamines may have serious interactions with protease inhibitors.)
People who are careful to follow side effect pre-treatment guidelines report that the first few days of IL-2 therapy are relatively easy. If side effects emerge, they usually are worst on the last two or three days of a five-day course. To minimize interference with day jobs, some people begin their five-day course of IL-2 on a Wednesday. This plan helps time the worst side effects to occur over a weekend or at a time when a person is not working.
People who take IL-2 recommend that you ask someone to stay with you overnight if possible, through the first five-day course. If that's not possible, ask a friend to check on you periodically. If you have children, see if a friend or family member can take care of them for a few days as you may not feel up to the task yourself.
Experienced IL-2 users say that the more prepared you are, the easier it is and less likely that you'll experience severe side effects. The worst side effects seem to happen when you let your guard down, aren't prepared and don't pre-treat for side effects. Ask for your doctor's emergency number in the event you need or want support through the side effects.
Another relatively common side effect is swelling, red marks or lumps where you inject yourself. Long-time IL-2 users note that putting an ice pack on the injection site before and after injections can help diminish the development of swelling and bumps. The cold temperature has an effect that is identical to that of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, such as ibuprofen, although it's more concentrated at the site of the injection. Sometimes these lumps, or nodules at the site of injection, can last as long as a few months and they may even produce a scab. In nearly all cases they go away over time.
Other less frequent side effects include sinus congestion, low blood pressure, liver toxicity, swelling due to water retention, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, peeling skin, changes in mental status and altered blood levels including albumin, potassium, magnesium, calcium, red blood cells and platelets. Nearly all side effects diminish quickly when the drug is stopped, usually at the end of a five-day course. In rare cases, IL-2 has been linked to hypothyroidism, vision problems (including blindness) and depression leading to suicide. There is a long list of potential side effects associated with IL-2. The most serious of these occur relatively rarely in doses used in people living with HIV.
As mentioned earlier, IL-2 can also temporarily stimulate HIV replication. Studies show that this viral activity can be controlled with the use of anti-HIV therapy. More importantly, these temporary increases don't appear to have negative long-term consequences.
Certain side effects are potentially more severe and of greater concern than others. Contact your healthcare provider immediately if:
For more information on IL-2 side effects and side effects management, read Taking IL-2 and Managing Its Side Effects.
To manage toxicity and side effects, individuals reduce the daily dose of IL-2 in three MIU increments. For example, if 15 MIU daily schedule was very difficult for an individual to take, then the next five-day course dose would be 6 MIU twice daily (total daily dose of 12 MIU), for five consecutive days. Unlike anti-HIV therapy, lowering the dose of IL-2 does not lead to drug resistance.
Studies show that people who tolerate the higher starting doses (15 MIU) for three cycles are most likely to see immediate CD4+ cell count increases. People who start with the lower 4.5 MIU twice daily dose (total daily dose of 9 MIU) still get substantial increases in CD4+ cell count, but these increases usually take longer. In this situation, it often takes a number of cycles before any significant change is seen.
When trying to measure how IL-2 affects CD4+ counts, it's important not to take the CD4+ test too quickly after using IL-2, as this produces exaggerated and false results. Immediately after taking IL-2, CD4+ cells initially are depressed and then are highly stimulated and stirred up in the blood, causing potentially meaningless changes in the CD4+ count. Great increases might be seen a few days to a few weeks after IL-2, but these immediate changes generally decline rapidly after that.
Changes in the CD4+ count are only real and meaningful when the CD4+ test is taken a month or more after the last use of IL-2. For many people, no significant change is seen for several months, despite the short-term ?bursts? of CD4+ activity seen right after IL-2 is taken. Over time though, the average level of CD4+ cells begins to rise and remains consistently above the levels seen before IL-2 use began.
Once someone has reached a goal in terms of CD4+ cell count increase, the time between courses of IL-2 therapy will be increased by four-week periods or longer if CD4+ cell counts are sustained. Blood work for CD4+ cell counts and HIV levels should be run two weeks before an IL-2 cycle. (Note: Lab test results done within four weeks after a cycle are considered unreliable.)
For more information on IL-2 side effects and side effects management, see Taking IL-2 and Managing Its Side Effects.
Some people using subQ IL-2 who failed to achieve CD4+ cell increases over time attained these increases when they switched to continuous intravenous (CIV) therapy. Early studies of IL-2 involved five-day continuous intravenous (in the vein) infusions, every eight weeks. Starting doses ranged from 9?18 MIU, daily. In general, the 15?18 MIU CIV daily doses were not well tolerated. Starting doses of 9?15 MIU were slightly more tolerable in CIV IL-2 studies.
CIV IL-2 side effects are more common and severe than side effects seen with the subcutaneous injection dosing. A large percentage of people taking IL-2 will see sizable CD4+ cell count increases with the less toxic and easier-to-use subQ approach. However, for those who don't experience CD4+ cell count increases with subQ injections, CIV IL-2 represents another option. Optimally, the first few CIV IL-2 cycles should be done in a hospital or clinic setting with skilled staff to support with side effects management. For more information, see Dosing Considerations.
Because it's already FDA-approved for treating cancer, some doctors prescribe IL-2 for off-label use (giving a drug for purposes other than what it was approved). Insurance companies don't always pay for off-label use and IL-2 can be quite expensive. It should be used only under close doctor supervision, and blood should be checked for liver and kidney toxicity and lab abnormalities. For more information on the assistance program, call 1-866-385-4729.
Dosing strategies to consider:
IL-2 and CD4+ cell count, viral load and general health
IL-2 and other therapy
Two major obstacles in developing IL-2 for HIV disease are the difficulty of taking the therapy and its side effects. Some people may not be willing to undergo twice daily injections for five days, every two months. Moreover, people who otherwise feel good might be unwilling to endure the flu-like symptoms. Because IL-2 has had such a pronounced and sustained increase on CD4+ cell counts, enthusiasm for it continues despite the challenges that taking the drug and side effects pose.
Despite pronounced and significant increases in CD4+ cell counts induced by IL-2 therapy, there is as yet no clear proof that these increases result in longer life or longer disease-free time. At the heart of the debate is whether increased CD4+ cells from IL-2 therapy function properly. So far, data overwhelmingly suggest that these cells do function properly, and in general those with sustained CD4+ cell increases have not experienced opportunistic infections at abnormally high CD4+ cell counts. When the cells are tested they appear normal and functioning, yet researchers readily admit that the tests to measure cell function leave a lot to be desired. These tests, however limited, suggest that the cells work at least as well as new CD4+ cells produced through anti-HIV therapy.
As of February 2007, one of the two largest studies of IL-2 is in jeopardy. Despite nearly two decades of drug developing in HIV under the auspices of Chiron Corporation, another company (Novartis Pharmaceuticals) bought out Chiron. Novartis originally seemed to suggest it would honor its obligations to the HIV affected community and complete these studies. In the eleventh hour, however, they seem not committed to carrying this important research to fruition and will abandon years of effort and turn their backs on the HIV affected communities. If this should be the case, it should not be allowed to happen without large public outcry.
How to Get It:
This article was provided by Project Inform. Visit Project Inform's website to find out more about their activities, publications and services.