|
U.S. News CDC Recommends Routine HIV Testing for U.S. Residents Ages 13 to 64, Dropping Written Consent, Pretest Counseling RequirementsSeptember 22, 2006 CDC on Thursday released revised recommendations on HIV testing in the U.S. that say HIV tests should become a routine part of medical care for residents ages 13 to 64 and requirements for written consent and pretest counseling be dropped, the Washington Post reports (Brown, Washington Post, 9/22). CDC estimates that about 25% of HIV-positive people in the U.S. do not know their status. Many physicians believe that routine testing could lead to an earlier diagnosis and earlier treatment (Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report, 5/8). According to an agency release, the recommendations, published in the Sept. 22 edition of CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, were designed to "simplify the HIV testing process" and "overcome several barriers that hindered implementation" of the agency's previous guidelines -- released in 1993 -- calling for tests to be given to "high-risk individuals" and to all patients "in health care settings" with HIV prevalence of more than 1% (CDC release, 9/21). According to the revised guidelines, health care providers should continue routine HIV testing unless they establish that less than one of every 1,000 patients tested is HIV-positive, "at which point such screening is no longer warranted" (Branson et al., MMWR, 9/22). States can choose to adopt and modify the guidelines, the New York Times reports (McNeil, New York Times, 9/22). CDC has been working on the revised guidelines for about three years, receiving feedback from more than 100 groups, including HIV/AIDS patient advocacy groups and physician associations (Stobbe, AP/Forbes, 9/21). According to the Los Angeles Times, the recommendations "carry no legal force," but now insurance companies are more likely to cover the cost of the tests (Maugh, Los Angeles Times, 9/21). If health care providers follow the guidelines, the number of HIV-positive people who are unaware of their status might be reduced by two-thirds, the Post reports (Washington Post, 9/22). Lawrence Gostin, associate dean at the Georgetown University Law Center, said that a physician might incur legal issues if he or she does not at least tell a patient about the value of HIV testing and that patient has contracted HIV (Hendrick, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 9/22). CDC in the release said it will issue additional guidelines for physicians by early next year and provide "model approaches and practical tools" for implementing HIV testing (CDC release, 9/21). Consent and Counseling Recommendations Testing Pregnant Women "We urgently need new approaches to reach the quarter-million Americans with HIV who do not realize they are infected," CDC Director Julie Gerberding, said, adding, "People with HIV have a right to know that they are infected so they can seek treatment and take steps to protect themselves and their partners" (Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 9/22). The American Medical Association said it supports the changes, and many physicians are expected to endorse the recommendations. "These recommendations are important for early diagnosis and to reduce the stigma still associated with HIV testing," Nancy Nielsen, an AMA board member, said (New York Times, 9/22). Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) added that the recommendations will "greatly enhance our ability to control the spread of this disease and improve the lives of those living with it" (AIDS Healthcare Foundation release, 9/21). More than 12 HIV/AIDS advocacy groups released a statement critical of the recommendation to remove the requirement for pretest counseling. "We fear that some health care settings will interpret today's announcement as a call for universal screening and test patients without informing them or arming them with the information they need to avoid putting others at risk," David Munar, associate director of AIDS Foundation Chicago, said. Peter Staley, founder of ACT UP, said that while "abandoning written informed consent raises issues" such as privacy and stigma, he supports the recommendations because "the bottom line is that this would probably save lives" (USA Today, 9/22). AIDS Project Los Angeles in a release said that while it supports the new guidelines, the group is unsure about who will pay for increased testing costs and whether it will deplete "already inadequate HIV/AIDS funding." APLA Executive Director Craig Thompson said, "This mandate would require at least an additional $6 billion, yet the federal government has cut domestic funding for care, treatment and services over the past five years," adding, "Conducting millions of HIV tests without appropriating the money for follow-up care is an empty promise" (APLA release, 9/21). Timothy Mastro, acting director of CDC's Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, said that while there is not a "direct link" between the recommendations and coverage of the test costs, "[w]e think this will contribute to insurers and Medicare, Medicaid covering it, but it's not an automatic" (Atlanta Journal Constitution, 9/22). "It's all in the implementation," Munar said, adding, "I am concerned that in some settings that patients will be shortchanged" (Washington Post, 9/22). Back to other news for September 22, 2006
![]() "Vast Majority" of Clinton Global Initiative Conference Attendees Made, Kept Commitments, Former President Clinton Says in NPR Interview This article was provided by Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. It is a part of the publication Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report. Visit the Kaiser Family Foundation's website to find out more about their activities, publications and services.
|
|