Print this page    •   Back to Web version of article

Access to Treatment Worldwide: From Talk to Action at Durban

by John S. James

July 28, 2000

Today more than 90% of people with HIV or AIDS have no access to modern medical care for this condition; the most prominent, but not the only obstacle, is price. Much more happened regarding this issue during the Durban conference (the XIII International AIDS Conference, July 9-14, 2000) than ever before. Some highlights:

MSF (Medecins Sans Frontières, also known as Doctors Without Borders, which made news earlier this year for winning a Nobel prize for its work) studied drug prices internationally and talked to generic manufacturers in Brasil and Thailand, and learned that the drug price for certain modern antiretroviral combination treatments could be reduced to as little as $200 per year in developing countries, assuming large-scale production (all prices in this article are in U.S. dollars). At this price, treatment could be feasible in most of the world through private and/or public funding.

$200 per year is about a tenth of the "85% reduction" price from the recently announced public-private partnership of UNAIDS and major pharmaceutical companies. It is also much less than current generic prices in countries which allow generic competition with antiretrovirals, all of which are patented in their country of origin (although not in many developing countries). These higher generic prices reflect much smaller production runs, which must recoup high set-up costs.

MSF also noted that there are precedents for great price differences in essential drugs between developing and wealthier nations. For example, oral polio vaccine costs 33 times less for international health organizations than the price the U.S. government pays -- which is a fraction of the catalog price which an individual in the U.S. would pay. (By suggesting widely different prices we do not mean to imply that U.S. proprietary drug prices should not be reduced -- only that they do not need to be reduced to 2% or 3% of current levels, the prices viable for many African or other developing countries.)

$200 per year for antiretroviral combinations would not pay for research to develop the next generation of drugs. But the current situation, where people in poor countries are left to die without standard treatments, does not pay for this research either.

The $200 per year figure provides a target to work toward and a place to begin in planning for making treatment access more available. It allows work to begin on providing simpler treatments (including opportunistic infection prophylaxis, nutritional improvement, clean water, and other approaches) -- without the issue of accepting a lower standard of care (no antiretrovirals regardless of medical need) for the developing world.

The full report (Campaign for Access to Essential Medicines. HIV/AIDS Medicines Pricing Report. Setting Objectives: Is There a Political Will? by Carmen Perez-Casas, with co-authors Daniel Berman, Pierre Chirac, Toby Kasper, Bernard Pecoul, Isabelle de Vincenzi, and Tido Von Schoen-Angerer) is available at (or see It was released by MSF on the opening day of the conference, July 9.

Brasil is now providing antiretroviral treatment to over 80,000 patients, through generic production within the country. But before the Durban conference, its success was not completely known internationally, even to specialists. Generic production has resulted in a price drop of almost 80% within the last five years.

At the Durban conference, ACT UP Paris organized a meeting between health ministers and generic manufacturers. We could not attend as it was closed to the press so that participants could speak freely, but we heard that it was very successful, with the beginnings of a bargaining dialogue on potential drug purchases.

Also, this conference highlighted a shift in thinking on prevention. Many have feared that treatment would take resources away from prevention, which could save many more lives per dollar spent. Now there is growing agreement that prevention is indeed the most important, but also that treatment must be possible for prevention to work, as otherwise people have no incentive to be tested.

Several major pharmaceutical-company donation programs were announced at the time of the conference. Boehringer Ingelheim said that it would donate nevirapine for preventing transmission from pregnant women to their children. Merck & Company and the Gates Foundation announced a $100 million five-year program for Botswana. Abbott will donate financially to four countries, two of them in Africa (Tanzania and Burkina Faso).

On July 17 the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) announced a "defiance campaign" to import fluconazole, an important antifungal, into South Africa, from countries where it is many times cheaper. For more information see the TAC Website,

The July 9 rally and march in Durban just before the conference, attended mostly by Africans, showed that the movement for treatment access is developing broad public appeal in Africa, not limited to AIDS specialists and activists. Organized primarily by TAC, the march drew between 2,000 and 5,000participants -- apparently the largest AIDS march ever in Africa.

Before the conference, if a health minister from a developing or least-developed country wanted information on how to move toward access to HIV treatment, it was difficult to know where to begin. Now the path is more clear.

From the MSF Report:

ISSN # 1052-4207

Copyright 2000 by John S. James. Permission granted for noncommercial reproduction, provided that our address and phone number are included if more than short quotations are used.

Back to the AIDS Treatment News July 28, 2000 contents page.

This article was provided by AIDS Treatment News. It is a part of the publication AIDS Treatment News. You can find this article online by typing this address into your Web browser:

General Disclaimer: is designed for educational purposes only and is not engaged in rendering medical advice or professional services. The information provided through should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a disease. It is not a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you may have a health problem, consult your health care provider.