HMOs, Health Insurance: More ProblemsOctober 20, 2000
It is well known that HIV patients live longer if they receive care from an HIV specialist than from a general physician -- and that the high-quality specialist care actually costs less, because it avoids unnecessary hospitalization and other expenses. But even though insurers know well that specialist care is both better and cheaper, they also know that they can save even more money by denying it, so that seriously ill patients will find their health plan unsatisfactory and go elsewhere if they can. In September of this year a California bill, AB 2168, to require that California HMOs offer care from physicians who have "demonstrated expertise" in treating AIDS, was signed into law. But some experts fear that this bill does not have teeth, because today there is no legal way of establishing what this "expertise" means, as HIV care is not formally recognized as a medical specialty at this time. Efforts to define such a specialty are ongoing. Clearly the system is not working when insurers have incentives to provide worse treatment (even when better treatment would cost less) to drive expensive patients away, or limit medical costs arbitrarily. William Owen, M.D., a leading HIV physician at the Davies campus, prepared information on how California patients can contact their insurance company, their employer, and state officials about problems affecting them; such pressure will help the movement for reform. For more information, contact AIDS TREATMENT NEWS, aidsnews@aidsnews.org or 800-TREAT-1-2.
Copyright 2000 by John S. James. Permission granted for noncommercial reproduction, provided that our address and phone number are included if more than short quotations are used.
This article was provided by AIDS Treatment News. It is a part of the publication AIDS Treatment News.
|
|