Structured Treatment Interruption: Important Controlled Trial in MonkeysDecember 1, 2000 A note from TheBody.com: Since this article was written, the HIV pandemic has changed, as has our understanding of HIV/AIDS and its treatment. As a result, parts of this article may be outdated. Please keep this in mind, and be sure to visit other parts of our site for more recent information! The first randomized, controlled study of structured treatment interruption (STI) found that monkeys on a three-week-on/three-week-off treatment schedule controlled the virus about as well as those which were on continuous therapy (and therefore received twice as much of the drugs). Also, those in the intermittent-treatment group became able to control virus without treatment for a six-month followup period when the drugs were stopped permanently (after 21 weeks treatment in this study), while those on continuous therapy usually could not.(1) These results are not automatically applicable to patients, for several reasons:
The researchers also used a new test for HIV-specific immune function -- counting the proportion of virus-specific CD8 cells by using flow cytometry to measure which of the cells produce gamma interferon in response to killed virus. This test (called VIR, for virus-specific immune responses) did distinguish the animals that could control the virus from those that could not, while the more common test for HIV-specific immunity (virus-specific CD4 stimulation index) did not distinguish between the groups in this study. (In addition, the new test would appear to be relatively easy to develop for clinical practice, while the stimulation-index test of immune function requires highly trained laboratory staff and would be difficult to make generally available.) In this controlled trial three groups of animals were compared: five which received no treatment, six which received continuous antiretroviral treatment for 21 weeks, and six which received four cycles of treatment for three weeks, separated by three-week periods without the drugs. The antiretroviral combination used was PMPA, ddI, and hydroxyurea. This study was done primarily by the RIGHT Institute (Research Institute for Genetic and Human Therapy) in Washington D.C. Franco Lori, M.D., and Julianna Lisziewicz, Ph.D., are the principal authors. CommentHuman studies of intermittent antiretroviral treatment are happening now. If this approach proves successful in certain identifiable patients, it could at least reduce the cost and toxicity of antiretroviral therapy -- and be a significant step toward treatment strategies to assist the immune system to control the virus instead of relying entirely on antiretroviral drugs. One hopeful sign was a late-breaker report at the Durban AIDS conference by Shoshank R. Joshi, M.D., D.M, Retroviral Physician at MGM hospital in Mumbai, India.(2) Twenty six of his patients took antiretroviral combination therapy (AZT or d4T, plus 3TC, plus saquinavir) on alternate months, because they could not afford continuous treatment. All of these patients had been recently diagnosed, were asymptomatic, and had a CD4 count of over 300 but a viral load over 20,000 when they started the intermittent therapy. At the end of a year, all of them had undetectable viral loads, and had remained asymptomatic and without side effects from the treatment. References
Copyright 2000 by John S. James. Permission granted for noncommercial reproduction, provided that our address and phone number are included if more than short quotations are used.
A note from TheBody.com: Since this article was written, the HIV pandemic has changed, as has our understanding of HIV/AIDS and its treatment. As a result, parts of this article may be outdated. Please keep this in mind, and be sure to visit other parts of our site for more recent information! This article was provided by AIDS Treatment News. It is a part of the publication AIDS Treatment News.
|
|