On June 11, the Food and Drug Administration issued a health advisory to
physicians around the country warning that protease inhibitors may
contribute to increases in blood sugar and even diabetes in people with
HIV, recommending the close monitoring of patients' glucose levels. In a
letter to doctors, the FDA said it received 83 reported cases of new or
exacerbated diabetes mellitus and hyperglycemia (increased blood sugar
levels) in HIV-positive patients taking any one of the new class of AIDS
drugs. Of the 83 people, 27 required hospitalization; six cases were
life-threatening. Five cases resulted in ketoacidosis, a serious
diabetes-related condition characterized by a fruity mouth odor, nausea and
vomiting, dehydration, weight loss, confusion, and, when left untreated,
coma or death.
Although diabetes is certainly serious, the FDA believes that its
infrequent occurrence does not warrant the cessation of protease therapy.
Many of the patients who developed diabetes while on protease inhibitors
were able to control it through insulin or other treatments. All four
FDA-approved protease inhibitors -- saquinavir, indinavir, ritonavir, and
nelfinavir -- will soon carry revised labeling that lists the potential
side effects. People with HIV who take protease inhibitors should know the
warning signs of hyperglycemia and diabetes: increased thirst and hunger;
unexplained weight loss; increased urination; fatigue; and dry, itchy skin.
In the cases reported to the FDA, these symptoms appeared an average of 76
days from the start of protease inhibitor therapy.
Government Guidelines on Protease Inhibitors
Imminent
Now that we've gotten your attention, here's a little more on protease
inhibitors: A group of AIDS experts convened by the Department of Health
and Human Services is currently putting the finishing touches on the first
federal guidelines on how to use protease inhibitors. According to The Wall
Street Journal on June 5, the guidelines sound that now familiar
refrain,"hit hard, hit early," but the document is expected to
clarify when exactly to start patients on protease inhibitors, what
combinations to use, how to monitor the effects, and what to do if the
drugs fail.
Principles the new guidelines cite are: treat aggressively to
suppress HIV to below the level of detection; use a combination of two
nucleoside analogs and one protease inhibitor; inform the patient of the
drawbacks of the treatment, including toxicity and the possibility of
developing resistance that limits future options (and now, presumably, the
somewhat remote risk of diabetes); perform regular tests to measure the
level of virus in the patient. Not recommended: the use of one or two
nucleoside analogs without a protease inhibitor.
The draft guidelines come at a time when there is growing concern
-- and mounting evidence -- that physicians aren't up to speed on the
latest developments in AIDS treatments; indeed, there are examples of
doctors who still prescribe AZT monotherapy. "I'm more worried than
I've ever been about the level of care being provided to AIDS
patients," said Dr. Eric P. Goosby of the Health and Human Services
Department and the White House Office of AIDS Policy. David Barr, Director
of the Forum for Collaborative HIV Research, cautions bluntly, "Some
doctors just don't get it." The confusion about treatment regimens is
understandable: It was only a year ago that the drugs became available and
were hailed as the most potent weapon to be added to the anti-HIV arsenal.
The federal guidelines are the work of two panels convened by the HHS's
National Institutes of Health and the Public Health Service.