Progress in Preventing Perinatal Transmission of HIVJanuary 1997 This article is part of TheBody.com's archive. Because it contains information that may no longer be accurate, this article should only be considered a historical document. Despite the excitement surrounding the results of ACTG 076 and initial
reports of decreased transmission in some populations, preventing perinatal
transmission has remained a formidable challenge. Some of the problems
include translating the recommendations into practice, determining whether
all three components of ZDV therapy are necessary, finding the most
appropriate therapy for ZDV pre-treated women, and learning whether newer
agents are safe and more effective. Most important, perhaps, is finding
solutions that can be applied in developing countries, where up to 1000
HIV-infected babies are born each day.
Several papers cast some light on a few of these questions. Dr. Susan Fiscus from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill presented continuing data on the success of a program to implement voluntary prenatal HIV testing and ZDV use for the state of North Carolina (Abstract #379). In 1995 and 1996 respectively, 84% and 93% of pregnant HIV-infected women were identified and offered ZDV. The transmission rate dropped from 21% in 1993 to 7.6% in 1996. Of 18 HIV infected children born in 1996, 14 were in women not treated with ZDV. The most common reason for not receiving ZDV was that the woman was never counseled. They reviewed the charts to determine whether the mother had received oral ZDV during pregnancy, IV therapy during labor, and whether the infant took oral ZDV. Although she advised caution based on small numbers in some groups, it appeared that maternal treatment was the most important component, and that ZDV offered little benefit to the infant if the mother was not treated. Several other studies reported progress in reducing transmission by implementing the PHS recommendations including studies from Wisconsin, and a report of slower but gratifying progress (against impressive odds) in New York City. Stephanie Blanche presented data from the French nationwide cohort study (Abstract #340). In France, physicians are legally obligated to offer HIV testing during pregnancy, but testing is voluntary. Less than 5% of pregnant women refuse testing and 88-90% are treated with ZDV. Transmission in France dropped dramatically beginning in late 1994 to only 5%. The efficacy of ZDV was similar across CD4 counts and in women delivering vaginally or by C section. However, among women who were pretreated with ZDV, there appeared to be little or now benefit. It seems likely that this is due to resistance, however, resistance studies are not yet available. This highlights the urgent need to explore other agents. An interesting poster presented the results of a preliminary study of the pharmacokinetics and safety of ZDV and 3TC in pregnant women and their infants. Pregnancy did not alter levels in the mothers, therapeutic levels were achieved in the infants with oral treatment, and no unusual toxicities were observed. This is encouraging, but similar studies are urgently needed with other nucleoside combinations for ZDV intolerant women (such as ddI/D4T) and with protease inhibitor containing combinations This article is part of TheBody.com's archive. Because it contains information that may no longer be accurate, this article should only be considered a historical document. This article was provided by The Body PRO. It is a part of the publication The 4th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections.
|