A note from TheBody.com: Since this article was written, the HIV pandemic has changed, as has our understanding of HIV/AIDS and its treatment. As a result, parts of this article may be outdated. Please keep this in mind, and be sure to visit other parts of our site for more recent information!
Despite the fact that the incidence and prevalence of
Pneumocystis carinii
pneumonia (PCP) among AIDS patients has declined over the years, due to
the widespread
use of prophylaxis, it remains an important cause of morbidity and
mortality in advanced
patients with HIV infection. At a symposium held at the 4th National
Retrovirus Conference in Washington, D.C. Dr. Henry Masur from the National
Institutes of Health
reviewed the state of the art in the management and prevention of the
infection in
the era of combination antiretroviral therapies and protease inhibitors.
One of the
unanswered questions is what to do with patients whose CD4 counts rises
over 200 cells/mm3,
the threshold below which prophylaxis is usually initiated. He presented
data showing
that the repopulation of CD4 cells after indinavir therapy includes both
memory and naive cells, yet some clonal deletions of some CD4 subsets
(including some in
the TCRV beta repertoire) may result in inadequate protection against PCP
as well
as other opportunistic infections.
The latest revision of Guidelines for the Prevention
of Opportunistic Infections in Persons with HIV Infection to be issued by
the United
States Public Health Service and the Infectious Disease Society of America
recommend
initiating prophylaxis for PCP based on the lowest CD4 count and not
discontinuing
it even if the CD4 count rises over 200 cells/mm3 with antiretroviral
therapy. Determinants
of PCP breakthrough episodes discussed by Dr. Masur included a prior AIDS
defining
opportunistic infection, a CD4 count < 50 cells/mm3 and use of a
regimen other than trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim or Septra). The
latter remains the prophylactic
agent of choice, yet the exact dosing schedule is still being debated.
Studies indicate
that one single strength tablet per day, one double strength tablet per day
or one double strength tablet thrice weekly are effective, yet as the
weekly dose increases
so does the incidence of intolerability. Investigational agents which can
be considered
for prophylaxis include clindamycin/primaquine, atovaquone, malarone,
azithromycin, benzimidines and pneumocadins.
The question of whether the Pneumocystis carinii
organism becomes resistant is still being investigated. As the fungus
cannot be isolated
in culture determination of phenotypic resistance is impossible. A study
showing
genotypic resistance among PCP breakthroughs was presented at the
conference, which
showed that mutations at two nucleotide positions of the dihydropteroate
synthase
(DHPS) gene were present in 4 of 6 patients who had broken through sulfa
prophylaxis.
Due to the lack of effective prophylactic therapies for patients with sulfa
breakthroughs, Masur recommended using higher doses of
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX)
in these patients to prevent subsequent breakthroughs. Another strategy
which was
reported was that of gradual initiation of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
as primary
prophylaxis using a suspension (8 mg TMP/40 mg SMX per ml) given gradually
over two weeks.
In a randomized, double-blind , placebo-controlled study of 377 patients,
significantly
fewer subjects discontinued TMP/SMX when it was initiated gradually than
when its was initiated as a double-strength tablet.
Advertisement
Another researcher from the University of Oxford, Dr.Ann Wakefield presented animal
data supporting the concept that PCP is host-species specific, and unlikely
to be
a zoonosis in humans. Genotyping of isolates of human-derived
Pneumocystis carinii
have demonstrated various different subtypes or polymorphisms. In 4 of 7
patients
with recurrent PCP the genetic sequences observed differed among the
subtypes recovered
at each episode. She postulated that PCP in patients with AIDS may result
from either reactivation or from reinfection with a different subtype.
Using spore traps she
was able to capture ambient air at rural sites and successfully recover
the PC spores
using PCR techniques. Whether the recovery of PC spores in ambient air from
hospitals imply that the infection is airborne and patients with AIDS and
PCP should be isolated
remains unanswered, since the infectiousness of these spores and their
reservoir
is unknown.
A note from TheBody.com: Since this article was written, the HIV pandemic has changed, as has our understanding of HIV/AIDS and its treatment. As a result, parts of this article may be outdated. Please keep this in mind, and be sure to visit other parts of our site for more recent information!