AVANTI 1 Shows Immunological Benefit for LovirideJanuary 1997 This article is part of TheBody.com's archive. Because it contains information that may no longer be accurate, this article should only be considered a historical document. Results from a multicenter clinical trial called AVANTI-1
conducted in Europe, Canada
and Australia were presented by Professor Rozenbaum at the National
Conference on
Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in Washington, D.C. Loviride, a
new nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor manufactured by Janssen
Pharmaceuticals at a
dose of 100 mg three times daily in combination with AZT and 3TC was
compared to
AZT and 3TC in a double blind, randomized trial which enrolled 106
antiretroviral
naive patients with CDC Group A or B/C stage disease.The average HIV viral
loads were 4.8-4.9
and CD4 counts were 270 in each group. The primary endpoint was the degree
and duration
of the reduction in HIV viral load and safety and tolerance of the
regimens. After 52 weeks of follow-up the average viral load reduction was
1.3 logs in the AZT +
3TC group and 1.6 logs in the triple combination group; a statistically
significant
difference, as was the median rise in CD4 counts (55 versus 98 cells,
respectively).
Although at 8 weeks of follow-up >50% of the patients in the triple drug
arm had viral
loads below the level of detection (< 500 copies/ml), the effect was not
sustained,
and after 52 weeks 11% versus 20% of the patients in each arm were
undetectable,
a non-significant difference. The CD4 response however was more durable;
with a median rise
of 127 cells from baseline in the triple drug arm, compared to 69 cell rise
in the
double drug arm. The only adverse effect that was more common in the 3 drug
group
was nausea which occurred in 20% versus 10% in the AZT + 3TC + loviride and
AZT + 3TC arms,
respectively. Withdrawal rates for serious adverse effects were similar
(15% versus
11%). The authors of the study concluded that the immunological effects of
the triple
combination were superior although the viral load reductions were similar.
This article is part of TheBody.com's archive. Because it contains information that may no longer be accurate, this article should only be considered a historical document. This article was provided by The Body PRO. It is a part of the publication The 4th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections.
|