Therapy InterruptusThe Latest News on Medically Monitored HIV Treatment Interruptions
November 2001 A note from TheBody.com: Since this article was written, the HIV pandemic has changed, as has our understanding of HIV/AIDS and its treatment. As a result, parts of this article may be outdated. Please keep this in mind, and be sure to visit other parts of our site for more recent information! To interrupt or not to interrupt, that is the question. Here is what we know that might help you decide. STIs -- structured or strategic HIV treatment interruptions -- are controversial. They should be done only under a doctor's supervision because it is important to regularly monitor your T-cell counts and viral load during an interruption. Here Are the Facts
Studies Show Good News and Bad NewsA current NIH study of eight people, using intermittent interruptions, is showing promise. Volunteers began taking their medicines every other week, seven days on, seven days off. Every volunteer in this group has been doing this for at least 48 weeks, the longest for 80 weeks. So far, no one has lost control of the virus. Their viral load tests show that during the interruptions, the amount of virus stays undetectable or has a small blip, similar to what happens when people take their medicines all the time. An extremely careful look at their virus shows that, as far as anyone can tell, it is not becoming resistant to the drugs at all. The data also shows the people in this study are experiencing decreased side effects. People in this experiment had 75% lower triglyceride levels and 15-20% lower cholesterol levels, about as good as drugs which lower cholesterol can do. This is great news, but the study is too small to generalize to everyone. Another NIH study shows long treatment interruptions may be dangerous for some people. In this study, some volunteers who took long interruptions before going back on drugs developed resistant virus. This depended on what drugs they were taking. The class of drugs called NNRTIs, like viramune or sustiva, hang around a long time in the blood and the virus can become resistant easily to this class of drugs. So during long interruptions, a few people taking sustiva developed virus that was resistant to sustiva. So it seems NNRTIs are bad candidates for STIs. People taking long STIs are also showing virus resistant to 3TC (epivir) as well, perhaps because 3TC hangs around in cells for a long time, and also is pretty easy to become resistant to. Since it is very important to catch the development of resistance very early so something can be done to protect a volunteer, taking drug holidays outside of a clinical trial is not very smart. And if you DO do it, don't be on sustiva, viramune, or be depending on 3TC. On the HorizonMany new studies of STIs are starting; goals for these studies include:
So, if you are intent on taking a holiday, get medical guidance, and, if at all possible, join a trial! It would be safer for you, and we all would benefit by learning about your experience. But please, don't take a holiday on your own! Dr. Mark Dybul, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, reviewed and commented on this article. A note from TheBody.com: Since this article was written, the HIV pandemic has changed, as has our understanding of HIV/AIDS and its treatment. As a result, parts of this article may be outdated. Please keep this in mind, and be sure to visit other parts of our site for more recent information! This article was provided by Search for a Cure. It is a part of the publication Reasons for Hope.
|
|