Print this page    •   Back to Web version of article

Consensus Statement
AIDSVAX Fails to Protect; VaxGen's Claims of Efficacy in Black and Asian Participants Are Misleading and Premature

March 2003

24 February 2003

The undersigned community-based HIV/AIDS organizations are deeply concerned by today's presentation of data from the phase III clinical trial of VaxGen's HIV vaccine candidate, AIDSVAX. While the overall result demonstrates a clear and disappointing lack of efficacy, VaxGen has chosen to spotlight several subgroup analyses that were not part of the statistical evaluation described in the original trial protocol. Specifically, the company claims that the vaccine showed an efficacy rate of 67% in people categorized demographically as Black, Asian or "Other" and an even greater efficacy rate of 78% when results in Black participants were analyzed separately.

These results should be treated with extreme skepticism until subjected to a detailed, independent scientific evaluation.

We fear that VaxGen has deliberately emphasized these putatively positive findings (on the CNN Financial News Network, VaxGen CEO Lance Gordon described them as a "marvelous result"), while failing to emphasize that they are based on very small numbers of infections in a limited sample of participants. This may serve the commercial interests of the company, but it does a great and profound disservice to the HIV-affected communities who must now struggle to make sense of the press stories that the VaxGen release has generated.

The Numbers Game: Reasons to Emphasize Uncertainty

While the desperate need for an HIV vaccine is clear, especially among the underserved communities that bear the brunt of the pandemic, hope cannot take flight on the gossamer wings of dubious subgroup analyses. It is critical that the scientific leads that may be contained in the VaxGen data are vigorously pursued, but the uncertainty associated with the results presented today must be clearly articulated.

We call on VaxGen to submit the findings to a panel of outside experts assembled by the National Institutes of Health for a full examination of the data and report to the public within 30 days.

AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition (AVAC)
Gay Men's Health Crisis (GMHC)
Project Inform
Treatment Action Group (TAG)

Back to the TAGline March 2003 contents page.

This article was provided by Treatment Action Group. It is a part of the publication TAGline. You can find this article online by typing this address into your Web browser:

General Disclaimer: is designed for educational purposes only and is not engaged in rendering medical advice or professional services. The information provided through should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a disease. It is not a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you may have a health problem, consult your health care provider.