Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
  
  • Email Email
  • Glossary Glossary
The Body Covers: The 5th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections
Antiretroviral Chemotherapy I

February 5, 1998


Role of d4T in initial combination regimens

Results of ACTG Study 306 were reported by Dr. Daniel Kuritzkes. This study compared various nucleoside-only containing regimens, including some monotherapy and 2-drug therapy regimens, to define the most potent and least toxic initial nucleoside(s).

299 therapy-naive patients with an average of 400 CD4 cells and an average viral load of about 10,000 copies were enrolled into one of six arms that included combinations of ddI, d4T, 3TC, and AZT. They found that all regimens were well-tolerated and that two of the two-drug combination, d4T-3TC and AZT-3TC, resulted in sustained 1 log suppression of viral load at 48 weeks. In addition, a ddI monotherapy arm, to which 3TC was added at 24 weeks, performed comparably.

The authors concluded that d4T-3TC is at least as active as AZT-3TC as an initial regimen.


Should AZT and d4T be used together?

Dr. Diane Havlir and colleagues presented results from 2 ACTG studies (ACTG 290 and ACTG 298). An important result from these studies was a definitive conclusion that AZT should never be used in combination with d4T. A controversy about this issue had existed for many years -- in vitro antagonism between the two drugs has been described by many. The two ACTG studies looked at both treatment-naive and AZT-experienced patients and randomized them to receive various mono- and 2-drug nucleoside regimens. Patients enrolled had moderate HIV disease (about 400 CD4 cells and 40,000 HIV RNA copies). Patients with AZT experience who received either d4T alone or AZT-d4T had no virologic response, compared to those who received ddI alone or with AZT. Furthermore, naive patients who received AZT-d4T had a more modest virologic effect than those receiving d4T alone or AZT-3TC.

The authors concluded that AZT and d4T should never be used in combination.

The scientific basis for the observation that AZT and d4T cannot be used together was addressed by Dr. J.P. Sommadossi and colleagues. They studied intracellular (between-cell) levels of the active metabolite (ingredient) of d4T in a very small group of patients from ACTG 290 (four patients receiving d4T alone and two receiving AZT-d4T). They found that those receiving d4T alone had 6.5 times more active metabolite than those on the combination of AZT-d4T. They concluded that the markedly lower levels of intracellular metabolite was directly associated with the inferior virologic effect.


Antiretroviral Effects of Therapy Combining Abacavir with HIV Protease Inhibitors

During the first session the Retrovirus Conference in Chicago, Dr. John Mellors of the University of Pittsburgh presented data from a Phase II study of abacavir (also known as 1592), an experimental nucleoside analogue being developed by Glaxo Wellcome. The study examined the safety and efficacy of abacavir (300 mg every 12 hours) in combination with five protease inhibitors in their standard dosages: indinavir, ritonavir, saquinivir soft gel, nelfinavir, and the investigational PI amprenavir, also known as 141W94 or Vertex-478 (1200 mg every 12 hours).

78 treatment-naive patients -- with a median viral load of about 60,000 copies/ml and a median T-cell count of 349 -- participated. They were randomized to one of the five possible treatment combinations and monitored for 16 weeks. Data were presented on 57 of the 78 patients who has completed 16 weeks of therapy, with results as follows:

Regimen Median Log Drop % Reaching
Undetectable
(under 400 copies/ml)
Abacavir + indinavir 1.83 log 70%
Abacavir + ritonavir 1.63 log 75%
Abacavir + SGV softgel 1.98 log 54%
Abacavir + nelfinavir 2.49 log 78%
Abacavir + amprenavir 2.42 log 85%


Because of the small study sample, none of the differences in treatment arms were statistically significant except Dr. Mellors noted a trend towards inferior performance in the saquinavir softgel (Fortovase) arm. The major issue with this trial was safety. Four of the 78 patients (nearly 5%) had a severe systemic hypersensitivity reaction, including vomiting, nausea, rash, and malaise. Dr. Mellors cautioned that treatment must be stopped immediately if this occurs, and that 'rechallenge,' or trying to start drug again, is not recommended and could be life-threatening. It remains to be seen whether the 5% number holds steady in further trials and broader use.



  
  • Email Email
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

This article was provided by The Body PRO. Copyright © Body Health Resources Corporation. All rights reserved.


Please note: Knowledge about HIV changes rapidly. Note the date of this summary's publication, and before treating patients or employing any therapies described in these materials, verify all information independently. If you are a patient, please consult a doctor or other medical professional before acting on any of the information presented in this summary. For a complete listing of our most recent conference coverage, click here.

Advertisement