Print this page    •   Back to Web version of article

Crystal Methamphetamine Use and Antiretroviral Drug Resistance: A Pilot Study of Behavioral and Clinical Correlates

By Amin Ghaziani

October 2005

Crystal Methamphetamine Use and Antiretroviral Drug Resistance: A Pilot Study of Behavioral and Clinical Correlates
The prevalence of recreational crystal methamphetamine use and related emergency room admissions are on the rise across the United States,1,2 accompanied by a curious media sometimes quick to sensationalize the trend, other times to isolate its impact on specific social groups (e.g., gay and bisexual men, circuit party attendees).3,4 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), amphetamines are the second most commonly used and abused controlled substances, after cannabis. More than 35 million people regularly abuse these substances.1,5

Even episodic or intermittent use of methamphetamines is associated with risky sexual practices likely to transmit HIV, such as unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) with serodiscordant sex partners.6 To the chagrin of public health scholars, crystal methamphetamine use has exploded concurrently with two other disconcerting trends: first, an increase in new HIV infections, particularly within the gay dance "circuit" and, on average, among an older cohort of gay men (e.g., the average age of a newly infected gay man in New York in 2005 is around 40 years)7-13 and second, a rise in antiretroviral (ARV) drug resistance within already-infected individuals.14 Antiretroviral drug resistance is a primary cause of treatment failure, is connected with neurological damage, and is linked to increased mortality.15-20 It therefore behooves researchers interested in treatment efficacy and group health to inquire into the relationship between crystal methamphetamine (ab)use and ARV drug resistance.

The crystal methamphetamine use-HIV infection-ARV drug resistance nexus is troubling. This is perhaps nowhere more pronounced than for communities of men who have sex with men (MSM), which are already encumbered by the persistence of risky sexual practices, including a resurgence of UAI and other activities associated with HIV transmission.9,21,22 Crystal methamphetamine use is often a culprit during seroconversion. One Los Angeles study found that 61% of gay and bisexual men seeking treatment for crystal methamphetamine dependence were infected with HIV.1 A recent San Francisco study also found that HIV incidence among methamphetamine users was statistically higher than among non-users, with users at least three times as likely as nonusers to be HIV-positive.23 These studies, along with others, suggest that crystal methamphetamine use is a common co-morbidity among HIV-positive individuals, whose viral loads also increase in its presence.14

Crystal methamphetamine-using seropositive individuals are at greater risk for ARV drug resistance, a relationship that is attributable to one or more of three causal mechanisms, of which two are clinical and one is behavioral.

In addition to compromised HAART effectiveness, the HIV-crystal methamphetamine nexus may also produce potentially fatal effects. In the human body, CYP2D6 is a liver enzyme that metabolizes both methamphetamines and protease inhibitors (PIs). Some PIs -- especially ritonavir (RTV) and delavirdine (DLV) -- have a greater affinity for this enzyme than do methamphetamines. When taken together, CYP2D6 will metabolize the PI before it will metabolize crystal methamphetamine. Delayed metabolizing of crystal methamphetamine allows levels in the bloodstream to rise to dangerous levels, especially in the brain -- a 3-to 10-fold increase -- which can result in fatal overdose.1,17

Although research on the clinical and behavioral mechanisms of ARV drug resistance is growing, the above discussion demonstrates the need for continued investigation. This article reports the results of a pilot study that is part of a larger project exploring the correlates of ARV drug resistance.


Methods

Sampling Strategy

Participants in the present study comprise a purposive sample of 38 physicians who are members of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care (IAPAC), a Chicago-based non-profit medical association that represents a professional membership of more than 12,000 physicians and other health care providers in more than 103 countries. Physician-members were surveyed at the IAPAC North American Sessions 2005, held June 3-4, 2005, in Chicago. This IAPAC-sponsored study is part of a larger, longitudinal study on the behavioral and clinical correlates of ARV drug resistance.


Instrument and Statistical Analyses

Physicians were asked to complete a 45-item questionnaire that contained a series of questions pertaining to their HIV-positive patients. Questions were clustered into five themes:

Two-tailed, Pearson's product-moment correlations were computed across items for behavioral and clinical cofactors. Because analyses were conducted on a small, purposive sample, results should be interpreted as indicating trends that signal the need for further investigation.


Results

Physician Practice and Patient Profile

On average, 60% of IAPAC physician-members' patients are HIV-infected; 55% are gay men. Five percent of the physicians see one to five HIV-positive patients per week; 21% see six to 10 per week; 29% see 11 to 20 per week; 24% see 21 to 50 per week; and 21% see more than 50 HIV-positive patients per week. Seventy-six percent of HIV-positive patients are on HAART. Forty-five percent of the patients are on an RTV-containing regimen, 3% on a DLV-containing regimen. At the time of the survey, 55% had undetectable viral loads, 20% were resistant to just one ARV drug, and 30% to multiple ARV drugs. Fifty-two percent of patients self-report to their physicians that they have missed taking their medications in the past month. The number increases to 70% for the past six months. The majority of patients cite reasons such as "forgot" and "traveling" for the missed doses. The second and third most common reasons for missing doses include physical side effects and the disruptive nature of controlled substances, respectively.

Physicians report extensive and varied illicit drug use by their patients. Crystal methamphetamine was the most commonly ingested drug for 11% of the patients. Forty-six percent of these patients reported using another controlled substance beside crystal methamphetamine. Of this group, 62% most commonly ingested alcohol, 21% most commonly ingested cocaine, 12% an erectile dysfunction medication, and 11% marijuana. The sixth most commonly ingested drug was ecstasy, followed by gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and ketamine, respectively. The physicians indicated that they believe 23% of their patients are habitual users of one or more controlled substances. Eleven percent of patients self-report taking an ARV "drug holiday" specifically because of illicit drug use. Only one third of the patients were described as being "very well informed" about the relationship between drugs and HIV.

Patients reported to their physicians a variety of socio-sexual behaviors. Fifteen percent of patients used Internet-based services to arrange sex, 13% had visited a bathhouse, and 8% had attended a circuit party. Eleven percent of patients self-report insertive UAI in the past six months; 8% report receptive UAI. Twenty-one percent of those who reported any type of UAI said they were using crystal methamphetamine at the time the UAI occurred. Another 32% of patients were high on another substance, and 53% of patients had consumed alcohol prior to or during the sexual encounter. Physicians believe that slightly more patients are "very well informed" about the relationship between drugs and sex (43%) than are very well informed about the relationship between such drugs and HIV (33%).


Crystal Methamphetamine and Resistance: Behavioral Risk Factors

Crystal methamphetamine use at one point in time increases the likelihood of future use. Crystal methamphetamine use in the past week is positively correlated with use in the past month (r = 0.975, P<0.001), use in the past three to six months (r = 0.833, P<0.001), and use in the past 12 months (r = 0.908, P<0.001). The use of crystal methamphetamine is associated with a series of risk factors connected to ARV drug resistance. For example, those who report crystal methamphetamine as their most commonly ingested drug within the past month show a trend for missing a medication dose in the past month (r = 0.417, P<0.085). Crystal methamphetamine users also participate in high-risk lifestyles. Those who used crystal methamphetamine in the past week, month, or 12 months were more likely to have gone to a bathhouse (r = 0.387, 0.374, and 0.422, respectively; P<0.05) and circuit party (r = 0.667, 0.657, 0.613, respectively; P<0.001).24 Crystal methamphetamine use is also connected to incidences of UAI. Those who used crystal methamphetamine in the past week, past month, and past 12 months were more likely to engage in insertive UAI (r = 0.662, 0.626, 0.541, P<0.001) and receptive UAI (r = 0.792, 0.729, 0.640, P<0.001), two high-probability HIV transmission-related sexual behaviors.


Crystal Methamphetamine and Resistance: Clinical Risk Factors

The survey instrument did not solicit specific information on TNF, metabolism, or CYP2D6. Results on the clinical aspect of the crystal methamphetamine/resistance relationship are therefore limited. Results do, however, suggest that those who used crystal methamphetamine in the past three to six months were also likely to be on an RTV-containing regimen (r = 0.335, P<0.028), which exacerbates the likelihood of a fatal drug-drug interaction. Those patients who self-report crystal methamphetamine as their most commonly ingested drug show a trend for being resistant to multiple ARV drugs (r = 0.446, P<0.083). The most substantively noteworthy finding, however, is that crystal methamphetamine use in the past week, month, three to six months, or 12 months is not correlated with having an undetectable viral load (r = 0.014, P<0.939; r = 0.071, P<0.697; r = -0.001, P<0.995; and r = -0.028, P<0.879, respectively). If the counterfactual is true, then those who do not report crystal methamphetamine use are likely to be those for whom HAART is effective and vice versa.


Discussion

It should be noted that results stem from a pilot study of 38 physicians attending the IAPAC North American Sessions 2005. Results are not intended to be definitive and generalizable without qualification, but rather suggestive of the viability of a potential behavioral and clinical relationship between crystal methamphetamine use and ARV drug resistance. The intent is to document trends and relationships to motivate further inquiry.

Results reveal that clinical and behavioral pathways undergird the relationship between crystal methamphetamine use and ARV drug resistance. The still-nascent literature emphasizes the role of inadequate adherence as a critical behavioral factor responsible for resistance. Study results are confirmatory. The possibilities for addiction are in place as patients who report using crystal methamphetamine at one point in time are also likely to report future use. Addiction concerns aside, crystal methamphetamine users are more likely to engage in a number of HIV-transmittable sexual behaviors such as insertive and receptive UAI. These findings are especially troubling in light of the fact that crystal methamphetamine users are more likely to visit bathhouses and attend circuit parties, where there may be an overall high prevalence of seropositive patrons and riskier sexual practices. The public health threat is exacerbated given that: (1) seropositive individuals exhibit a less cautious sexual profile,8 (2) crystal methamphetamine-using seropositive individuals are less likely to be adherent to their ARV regimen (which then increases the likelihood of ARV drug resistance),25-26 and (3) crystal methamphetamine-using seropositive individuals on HAART are likely to have higher viral loads.14

Study results corroborate the role played by behavioral and clinical factors in the relationship between crystal methamphetamine and ARV drug resistance. Although instrument limitations precluded testing for the direct or indirect role played by ARV drug metabolism, neurological damage, or apoptosis, results did reveal that those individuals who reported using crystal methamphetamine in a variety of different time periods were not likely to have undetectable viral loads. If the reverse is also true (i.e., that those who do not use crystal methamphetamine are statistically more likely to have undetectable viral loads), then there is further evidence for a clinical relationship between crystal methamphetamine use and ARV drug resistance. Much more research is required into this important and growing area of public health concern.

Amin Ghaziani is a consultant with the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care (IAPAC), and is a Ph.D. candidate in the Departments of Sociology and Management & Organizations at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois.


References

  1. Urbina A, Jones K. Crystal methamphetamine, its analogues, and HIV infection: Medical and psychiatric aspects of a new epidemic. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:890-894.

  2. Roberts DL, Ball J. Amphetamine and methamphetamine emergency department visits, 1995-2002. The DAWN Report. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. July 2004.

  3. Chibbaro L Jr. Bill passes targeting rave scene "chilling effect" on circuit parties feared. Washington Blade. April 18, 2003.

  4. Chonin N. Congress acts out against club culture. San Francisco Chronicle. April 27, 2003.

  5. Rawson R, Anglin M, Ling W. Will the methamphetamine problem go away? J Addict Dis. 2002; 21(1):5-19.

  6. Colfax G, Coates TJ, Husnik MJ, et al. Longitudinal patterns of methamphetamine, popper (amyl nitrite), and cocaine use and high-risk sexual behavior among a cohort of San Francisco men who have sex with men. J Urban Health. 2005;82(1, Suppl. 1):i62-i70.

  7. Bowers D. Don't fool yourself. HIV Plus. 2005;8(5). Accessed August 29, 2005.

  8. Colfax GN, Mansergh G, Guzman R, et al. Drug use and sexual risk behavior among gay and bisexual men who attend circuit parties: A venue-based comparison. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;28(4):373-379.

  9. Ghaziani, A, Cook TD. Reducing HIV infections at circuit parties: From description to explanation and principles of intervention design. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care. 2005;4(2):32-46.

  10. Lee SJ, Galanter M, Dermatis H, McDowell D. Circuit parties and patterns of drug use in a subset of gay men. J Addict Dis. 2003;22(4):47-60.

  11. Mansergh G, Colfax GN, Marks G, et al. The Circuit Party Men's Health survey: Findings and implications for gay and bisexual men. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):953-958.

  12. Mattison AM, Ross MW, Wolfson T, Franklin D, San Diego HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center Group. Circuit party attendance, club drug use, and unsafe sex in gay men. J Subst Abuse. 2001;13:119-126.

  13. Ross MW, Mattison AM, Franklin DR. Club drugs and sex on drugs are associated with different motivations for gay circuit party attendance in men. Subst Use Misuse. 2003;38(8):1173-1183.

  14. Ellis RJ, Childers ME, Cherner M, et al, and the HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center Group. Increased human immunodeficiency virus loads in active methamphetamine users are explained by reduced effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2003;188(12):1820-1826.

  15. D'Aquila RT, Johnson VA, Welles SL, et al. Zidovudine resistance and HIV-1 disease progression during antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 116B/117 Team and the Virology Committee Resistance Working Group. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122(6):401-408.

  16. Havlir DV, Marschner IC, Hirsch MS, et al. Maintenance antiretroviral therapies in HIV infected patients with undetectable plasma HIV RNA after triple-drug therapy. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 343 Team. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(18):1261-1268.

  17. Jones K. Methamphetamine, the brain, HIV, and mental health. Focus: A Guide to AIDS Research and Counseling. 2005;20(6):1-4.

  18. Miller V, Phillips A, Rottman C, et al. Dual resistance to zidovudine and lamivudine in patients treated with zidovudine-lamivudine combination therapy: Association with therapy failure. J Infect Dis 1998;177(6):1521-1532.

  19. Rey D, Hughes M, Pi JT, et al. HIV-1 reverse transcriptase codon 215 mutation in plasma RNA: Immunologic and virologic responses to zidovudine. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 175 Virology Team. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998;17(3):203-208.

  20. Weinstock HS, Zaidi I, Heneine W, et al. The epidemiology of antiretroviral drug resistance among drug-naive HIV-1-infected persons in 10 US cities. J Infect Dis. 2004;189(12):2174-2180.

  21. Halkitis PN, Parsons JT, Stirratt MJ. A double epidemic: Crystal methamphetamine drug use in relation to HIV transmission among gay men. J Homosex. 2001;41(2):17-35.

  22. Lewis LA, Ross MW. The gay dance party culture in Sydney: A qualitative analysis. J Homosex. 1995;29(1):41-70.

  23. Buchacz K, McFarland W, Kellogg TA, et al. Amphetamine use is associated with increased HIV incidence among men who have sex with men (MSM) in San Francisco. AIDS. In press.

  24. The data indicate that crystal users are likely to attend bathhouses and circuit parties. The survey instrument did not, however, inquire into the sexual practices (safer versus less safe) at these respective venues.

  25. Arnsten, JH, Demas PA, Grant RW, et al. Impact of active drug use on antiretroviral therapy adherence and viral suppression in HIVinfected drug users. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:377-381.

  26. Chesney, MA. Factors affecting adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(Suppl 2):S171-S176.




This article was provided by International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care. It is a part of the publication IAPAC Monthly. You can find this article online by typing this address into your Web browser:
http://www.thebody.com/content/art12236.html

General Disclaimer: TheBody.com is designed for educational purposes only and is not engaged in rendering medical advice or professional services. The information provided through TheBody.com should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a disease. It is not a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you may have a health problem, consult your health care provider.