EditorialOctober, 1996 Several weeks ago a three-year-old child was severely injured when he fell into the gorilla pit at Brookfield Zoo outside Chicago. The incident made international headlines when Binta-Jua, a 160-pound gorilla, rescued the severely injured boy and carried him to the zoo attendant who had cared for Binta-Jua during her pregnancy. The boy was saved; CNN featured a videotape of the rescue. Binta-Jua is now a celebrity with thousands of people standing in lines daily to see the gorilla that some journalists described as demonstrating "human compassion." I question the appropriateness of the phrase "human compassion," which appears to me to border on the oxymoronic. Compassion is an appropriate term since it describes a feeling or awareness of another's hardship, pain, or sorrow that moves one to help. Binta-Jua was aware of the child's injury and was moved to help the boy by carrying him to her attendant. I generally do not succumb to anthropomorphizing tendencies to ascribe human characteristics to animals or God. However, there appears to be adequate behavioral data to show the existence of compassion in some animals. Unfortunately, there is declining behavioral data to demonstrate the existence of compassion in some humans--especially those responsible for public policy. Globally, more than 10,000 children die each day from infectious diseases that could be prevented or adequately treated. We have the drugs, the knowledge, and the money to avert most of these five-million-plus deaths a year. What we don't have is compassion. We are not moved to help those who will die without such help. It would appear that compassion in animals has the potential of saving more children's lives than compassion in humans. This article was provided by International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care. It is a part of the publication Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care. |
|