Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
Read Now: Expert Opinions on HIV Cure Research
  
  • Email Email
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

Commentary & Opinion

Georgia Must Maintain "Delicate Balance" Between Public Health, Confidentiality in HIV Testing Program, Editorial Says

August 20, 2003

A note from TheBody.com: Since this article was written, the HIV pandemic has changed, as has our understanding of HIV/AIDS and its treatment. As a result, parts of this article may be outdated. Please keep this in mind, and be sure to visit other parts of our site for more recent information!

The experience of Georgia and other states shows that it is possible to implement disease reporting systems without violating the privacy of patients or discouraging them from seeking testing or treatment, but the state Division of Public Health should "stay mindful of the delicate balance between public health needs and privacy rights," an Augusta Chronicle editorial says (Augusta Chronicle, 8/19). Georgia, which had been the only state that did not have a system of collecting HIV case data with personal identifiers, last week announced plans to establish a names-based HIV reporting system. The state said that the current system of tracking HIV cases without personal identifiers, such as a patient's name or a unique identifying code, is not useful because the federal government requires more detailed information when determining state AIDS funding levels. Under the new system, doctors will be required to report the names of people who test positive for HIV. Test results will remain confidential and only the health department will have access to the names, health officials said (Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report, 8/14). The Chronicle says that the data collected could be used to "pinpoint" areas of the state that need funding for HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention education programs. But it is important for officials to be careful to maintain patient confidentiality because a privacy violation could "poison further efforts to collect vital public health data and could, quite possibly, worsen the epidemic," the editorial concludes (Augusta Chronicle, 8/19).

Back to other news for August 20, 2003


Reprinted with permission from kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/hiv. The Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of the Kaiser Family Foundation, by The Advisory Board Company. © 2003 by The Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

A note from TheBody.com: Since this article was written, the HIV pandemic has changed, as has our understanding of HIV/AIDS and its treatment. As a result, parts of this article may be outdated. Please keep this in mind, and be sure to visit other parts of our site for more recent information!



  
  • Email Email
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

This article was provided by Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. It is a part of the publication Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report. Visit the Kaiser Family Foundation's website to find out more about their activities, publications and services.
 
See Also
More About Policies on Reporting HIV Test Results in Southern U.S. States

Tools
 

Advertisement