Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
  
  • Email Email
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

Commentary & Opinion

Congress Should Not "Turn Cheap" When Appropriating Funds for Global AIDS Initiative, Dallas Morning News Editorial Says

August 5, 2003

A note from TheBody.com: Since this article was written, the HIV pandemic has changed, as has our understanding of HIV/AIDS and its treatment. As a result, parts of this article may be outdated. Please keep this in mind, and be sure to visit other parts of our site for more recent information!

Although the United States is "certainly ... in a budget crunch," the Senate "needs to adequately fund the first year" of President Bush's global AIDS initiative (HR 1298) when it returns from its August recess, a Dallas Morning News editorial says, adding that the House "shortchanged the start of the plan" by appropriating "about $2 billion" (Dallas Morning News, 8/3). Bush in May signed the measure, which authorizes $15 billion over five years to fight AIDS in Africa and the Caribbean. The House so far has approved a total of $2 billion for the AIDS initiative in fiscal year 2004, which represents only two-thirds of the $3 billion authorized in HR 1298 but fulfills Bush's budget request of $2 billion. The Senate Appropriations Committee last month approved an $18.1 billion FY 2004 foreign aid spending bill, including $1.4 billion to fight AIDS. Additional money for the initiative is expected to be included in other spending bills. In addition, the Senate on July 10 passed a nonbinding resolution calling for $3 billion to be appropriated in FY 2004 to fight AIDS overseas (Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report, 7/31). "It's wrong for lawmakers suddenly to turn cheap when it comes to writing the check for the first year" of the initiative, the Morning News says. The battle against AIDS requires the resources of the private sector and "the commitment of foreign governments," the editorial says, adding that Bush "was right to put ours on the line. Congress should keep it there." The Morning News concludes, "If we have the resources to fight military battles, we certainly have them to battle a deadly disease" (Dallas Morning News, 8/3).

Back to other news for August 5, 2003


Reprinted with permission from kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/hiv. The Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of the Kaiser Family Foundation, by The Advisory Board Company. © 2003 by The Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

A note from TheBody.com: Since this article was written, the HIV pandemic has changed, as has our understanding of HIV/AIDS and its treatment. As a result, parts of this article may be outdated. Please keep this in mind, and be sure to visit other parts of our site for more recent information!


  
  • Email Email
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

This article was provided by Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. It is a part of the publication Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report.
 
See Also
More Viewpoints on U.S. Global HIV/AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)

 

Advertisement