Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App 
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
  
  • Email Email
  • Comments Comments
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

Interview

How Do You Advise the President About HIV When He Doesn't Want to Be Advised?

Part One of a Two-Part Interview With Gina Brown

June 28, 2017

 1  |  2  |  Next > 

Gina Brown, M.S.W.

Gina Brown, M.S.W.

Gina Brown, M.S.W., and I already had an interview planned when the community got the news of her resignation, with five other members, from the U.S. President's Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (PACHA). That happened Friday, June 16, via fellow #PACHA6 resignee Scott Schoettes' Newsweek polemic on the Trump administration's poor handling of health care matters -- exemplified by his support for the American Health Care Act (AHCA). By Monday, when Gina and I met for lunch, the #PACHA6 story had mushroomed.

The Senate version of the AHCA, despite its sordid origins and wild unpopularity, could still see a vote in early July; the bill would be a nightmare for people living with HIV and others with preexisting conditions (not to mention uteruses). With the resignation of Gina, Scott and Grissel Granados, PACHA has now lost 60% of its members living with HIV.

"With this administration, I knew I couldn't play inside the sandbox with them," Gina commented, "So, I kicked the sand outside the box."

The original intention of our lunch was to talk about Gina's first six months as one of the Southern AIDS Coalition's community organizers -- and we did. Stay tuned for part two of our conversation, when Gina talks about how organizing work can be revolutionary.

Olivia G. Ford: Tell me about being part of what some are calling the "PACHA Six," who resigned last week because of the administration's scorn and dismissal of issues affecting the HIV community. How did you come to that decision?

Gina Brown, M.S.W.: I didn't resign out of some partisan desire. I believe the same is true for my comrades in the #PACHA6 (I came up with our hashtag!).

Advertisement

It wasn't about who was in the White House; it was about the policies that were being advanced from the White House. It could have been anybody: If these same policies had been on board, if that person had not agreed to meet with us, if that person had not ever said the word "HIV/AIDS" during their whole campaign, it would have been the same thing.

I think the biggest question for me was: How do you advise someone who does not want to be advised? Didn't Trump say about the wars [in the Middle East] that he was "smarter than the generals"? If you think you're smarter than everybody who's doing this work, then how are you going to effectively hear what we're saying?

When I think about health care, and I think about how they have tied Planned Parenthood into this American Health Care Act, just to defund it, out of spite, I think of the women who are going to be impacted by this. A lot of them are living with HIV. A lot of women get their diagnosis through a Planned Parenthood clinic.

I don't know why, in these crazy men's minds, Planned Parenthood is only about abortion. They don't know how many women find out they have cervical cancer at Planned Parenthood, how many women find out they have ovarian cancer, how many women find out that they cannot bear children or that they need a simple procedure to be able to have children.

They don't even get this. So, they're tying this health care around all these things that are going to impact women, and I'm supposed to sit on a council, sit at a table, knowing that I'm not even valued?

When we look at the budget: You talk about cuts to CDC [U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and NIH [U.S. National Institutes of Health]. That's prevention programs. That's research.

We've been down this road before. We had a president who never said the word "AIDS" at the time. We had a president who buried his head in the sand. And then the epidemic exploded.

For the first time, we have a chance to truly make an impact in HIV. We have PEP [post-exposure prophylaxis]; we have PrEP [pre-exposure prophylaxis]; and we have treatment as prevention. Those are all biomedical tools that will move us towards containing this, more and more. Why wouldn't we want to keep doing that? If I know that it costs more to take care of you when you're sick, I'm going to do everything in my power to keep you healthy.

OGF: Precisely! It's just basic math, right?

GB: I weighed all of those things in coming to my decision. But the straw that broke the camel's back was them, with their AHCA, and that keg party they had in the Rose Garden, celebrating the fact that they were going to be stripping health care from millions of people. And a lot of those people are living with HIV.

We already have Southern cities that didn't expand Medicaid. This is another thing: If the Affordable Care Act is so bad, let's rewind and let's look at why it's so bad. It's so bad because a lot of your Republican governors said, "We're not setting up exchanges, and we're not going to expand Medicaid."

OGF: The ACA wasn't ever allowed to work. It wasn't allowed to do what it's supposed to do.

GB: Thank you. That would be like buying a new car and two of the wheels are missing. And then you're wondering why you can't get from point A to point B. All of the pieces needed to be there for us to see this thing succeed.

With this administration, I knew I couldn't play inside the sandbox with them. So, I kicked the sand outside the box and decided I'm going to play outside the box.

I can't play nice. This is my life. I've been living with HIV for 23 years. I didn't come this far to see things blow up behind some policies that are made by people who don't understand me, or nobody that looks like me, or acts like me, or talks like me. Millionaires and billionaires are making policy for people who make less than $50,000 a year. But they say they have our best interests at heart. Really? I don't think so.

OGF: What's been the reaction in the community to your PACHA resignation?

GB: I'm grateful that I have such a strong support system. I have not had one person tell me, "You were wrong for doing that. You shouldn't have done that." So many people have said: "I respect you even more now for doing this. You showed that you have principles." It shows that the compassion that I talk about, I walk about. I don't just say it; I do it.

I think about when I got on PACHA, how we were working on updating a national HIV strategy, and thinking, "I'm a part of history; this is a historic event" -- never knowing that in a matter of years, a couple of years, somebody would try to take that progress and throw it in the garbage can.

 1  |  2  |  Next > 


Related Stories

Members Resign From Trump HIV/AIDS Commission -- and Others Stay; All Are Needed in the Fight
Dear HIV Community: Fight for Your Health Care in U.S. Senate Trumpcare Bill
How Trumpcare Threatens the Lives of Women Living with HIV
More on U.S. HIV/AIDS Policy


  
  • Email Email
  • Comments Comments
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

This article was provided by TheBody.com.
 

No comments have been made.
 

Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)

Your Name:


Your Location:

(ex: San Francisco, CA)

Your Comment:

Characters remaining:

 

Advertisement