HIV 'Undetectable = Untransmittable' Is a Game-Changing Fact. Why Isn't the Message More Public?
May 8, 2017
New York City's openly gay health department assistant commissioner Demetre Daskalakis was on hand as one of the DJs, as openly HIV-positive folks such as NYC councilmember Corey Johnson and Housing Works founder Charles King boogied down to jams like the Notorious B.I.G.'s "Hypnotize."
As Mary J. Blige might say, there was definitely no hateration going on up in that dancerie!
In recent months, a stunning array of prominent international agencies and individuals have signed onto a U=U consensus statement saying that, based on modern science, undetectable people cannot transmit HIV. They include AIDS United, GMHC, the Human Rights Campaign, the International AIDS Society, the UK's National AIDS Trust and the National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors (NASTAD), to name just a few.
"U=U is such incredible news that we've been saying we should be dancing in the streets about it," says Bruce Richman, who started Prevention Access Campaign. Richman says he's been eager to get the U=U word out since he learned in 2012 that because he was undetectable he was not infectious. (He was diagnosed with HIV in 2003.)
This has massive health, prevention and legal implications. It means that HIV-positive folks and their HIV-negative sexual partners can all but stop freaking out about the possibility of transmission. It also renders even more outdated various state laws from the 1980s and 1990s that criminalize HIV-positive people for endangering sexual partners when they don't disclose their HIV status. Finally, it should serve to reduce the stigma suffered by HIV-positive people, who are often made to feel as if they are second-class citizens for carrying an infectious virus.
But despite all that -- and despite the fact that U=U has essentially attained global scientific and advocacy consensus -- national, state and local entities still do little to broadcast this fact to the general American public. A brief review of the main HIV webpages for health departments nationwide serving those states and cities hardest hit by HIV found that not one stated in clear language that people with undetectable HIV were incapable of transmitting the virus.
Even states that mention PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis, or taking the HIV med Truvada [tenofovir/FTC] to prevent getting HIV) or the fact that pregnant women on meds can prevent HIV from passing to their children made no mention of U=U among sexual partners.
New York State, which, along with California, has usually put out the most current HIV messaging in the country, says that being undetectable "decreases but does not eliminate" the chance of transmission. Moreover, the Mayo Clinic, one of the more prominent health info sites online, doesn't mention U=U at all http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/hiv-aids/basics/prevention/con-20013732]] on its HIV prevention page.
"None of the websites are saying this, none of the marketing campaigns," says Richman. "I've found that people who know this information tend to be privileged, have private insurance, are often white. That is so unjust that information that concerns are our social, sexual and reproductive health and lives is being withheld."
This article was provided by TheBody.com.
Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)
The content on this page is free of advertiser influence and was produced by our editorial team. See our advertising policy.