When Is HIV a Crime? Sexuality, Gender and Consent
July 16, 2014
Kim S. Buchanan (USC Gould School of Law) has written "When Is HIV a Crime? Sexuality, Gender and Consent" for publication in an upcoming issue of the Minnesota Law Review. The file included here is a draft of the unpublished article. Please do not quote or cite from this article without the author's permission. Here is the abstract:
HIV criminalization is difficult to justify on the grounds advanced for it: public health and moral retribution. This Article engages with a third, underexamined rationale for HIV criminalization: sexual autonomy. Nondisclosure prosecutions purport to ensure "informed consent" to sex. However, almost all other forms of sexual deception -- including deceptions that may jeopardize the partner's health -- are lawful; rape law expressly accommodates an expectation that men may lie to get sex from women. Neither public health nor retributive considerations adequately justify singling out HIV from other, permitted forms of sexual deception.
Moreover, most HIV transmission and nondisclosure takes place between men, but a large majority of prosecutions involve men accused of nondisclosing to women. The inconsistency of HIV laws with their ostensible rationales, their arbitrary inclusions and exclusions, and the striking disparities in HIV prosecutions all tend to raise suspicion that discriminatory impulses may be at work. Criminal laws and their implementation tend to frame HIV as a crime that matters most when it disrupts expectations that non-drug-injecting heterosexuals should be immune to anxiety about HIV. They situate HIV as fairly benign when contained within stigmatized populations such as gay men, intravenous drug users, Africans and sex workers.
When HIV-positive people transgress these boundaries and cause heterosexual men and women to worry about HIV, though, this transgression is often punished as a crime, even when the behavior poses no transmission risk. HIV laws and their implementation raise concern that discriminatory fallacies about race, gender and sexuality may shape perceptions of whether, when and why HIV is a crime.
Kim Shayo Buchanan is an Associate Professor of Law and Gender Studies at USC Gould Law School. She specializes in constitutional law, international and comparative human rights law, prisoners' rights, reproductive rights, race, gender and sexuality. Her current research addresses race, gender and prisoners' rights against sexual abuse, and the sexual dimensions of gender equality. She teaches constitutional law, reproductive rights, and international human rights law.
Lambda Legal Calls for Halt to HIV-Based Criminal Prosecutions in Wake of Department of Justice Guidance
Justice Department Releases Best Practices Guide to Reform HIV-Specific Criminal Laws to Align With Scientifically-Supported Factors
This article was provided by The Center for HIV Law and Policy. Visit their website at www.hivlawandpolicy.org.
Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)