The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App 
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol

Promiscuous Gay Nerd: "If You Use It, Test It!" Toward a Gay Men's Sexual Health Standard of Care

December 12, 2013

 < Prev  |  1  |  2 

I sent this document to my provider and to the director of the student health clinic, but they refused to change course. They were sticking to their original story: No FDA approval, no test. While it is technically true that the FDA has not approved NAAT tests for rectal and pharyngeal swabs, the tests are used widely by clinics that serve gay men. It's about priorities, and gay men's health isn't even remotely at the top of that list.

In order to understand what 21st-century sexual health screening for gay men could look like, I asked the director of Magnet, Steve Gibson, about their standard of care. "Culturally competent STI screening for gay men should basically mean, if you use it, you should check it: your butt, your throat, and your dick! Many gay men coming in to Magnet know a great deal about HIV but very little about other STIs. We do a lot of basic education about how STIs can be spread and treated." A lot of times, though, you have to ask for what you need. For example, Magnet customers have told Gibson that Kaiser Permanente does not routinely test them for rectal and pharyngeal gonorrhea and chlamydia unless they specifically request it.

When it comes to HIV testing, Magnet has put together a state-of-the-art program. Like many clinics, they use a rapid HIV test, the Clearview HIV 1/2 STAT-PAK Test, for the initial screen. For those men whose first test was "reactive" (positive), a second rapid test, this time the OraQuick ADVANCE Rapid HIV-1/2 Antibody Test (the same one you can buy over the counter for about $40), is performed to verify HIV infection. This allows Magnet to promptly begin linking newly diagnosed individuals to care.


But antibody tests can't pick up recent infections. While RNA tests can detect HIV in a person's blood within 9 to 11 days after the person is infected, they're expensive. In my case, health insurance covers the cost. But public health clinics generally can't foot the bill. In order to get around this hurdle, Magnet partners with the San Francisco Department of Public Health laboratory to conduct pooled HIV RNA testing: Magnet sends individual specimens to the lab, the lab combines samples from each (ten at a time) and runs a single test, and if the result is reactive, the lab then tests every individual specimen to find which ones contain HIV RNA. Creativity for the win!

You may have heard recently that a new rapid HIV test was FDA-approved that actually can detect recent HIV infections. This test, The Determine HIV 1/2 Antigen/Antibody Combo, tests for both antigens and antibodies and thus is much better at detecting recent infections. But while it's approved for laboratory settings, it's not yet approved for community-based sites like Magnet. COME ON, ALREADY!

The truth is that the FDA probably has about zero pressure on it to approve the new HIV test for use in community clinics or to approve the use of NAAT tests for rectal and pharyngeal gonorrhea and chlamydia screening. Why? The sad reality is that few organizations are out there actively organizing on behalf of gay men's health. LGBT organizations don't prioritize it. HIV organizations are often too scared about losing even more funding to raise any hell with government agencies. Although glimmering signs of its resurgence have appeared recently, ACT UP today is more a subject for documentaries than a real force in current politics.

But while ACT UP may be a shadow of its former self, its lessons live on. In the words of Steve Gibson, "We all have a right to the best possible, most relevant and accurate information about our health without bias or prejudice from medical or public health providers." And as we all know, rights don't magically translate into reality. Nobody is going to give gay men the health care we need without a fight. Is your health clinic offering NAAT tests for gonorrhea and chlamydia? No? Ask why. Demand they start doing it. Does your doctor know about PrEP? Ask. What's your state health department's stance on sexual health screening for gay men? Do they have one? If we want answers, we're going to have to start asking questions and raising hell.

What's your experience like at your local health clinic? Share your stories in the comments or, as always, shoot me an email at

Jake Sobo is a pen name used for anonymity. Jake has worked in the world of HIV prevention for nearly a decade. He previously published a 19-part series documenting his experiences on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), "My Life on PrEP," for Positive Frontiers magazine, which was picked up by Manhunt, translated into French, and widely read in the HIV prevention world. He has spent the better part of his adult life having as much sex as possible while trying to avoid contracting HIV.

 < Prev  |  1  |  2 

More From This Resource Center

Undetectable Viral Load and HIV Prevention: What Do Gay and Bi Men Need to Know?

Do HIV-Negative Gay Men Need Condoms if They're on PrEP? Here's What I Tell My Patients

This article was provided by BETA. Visit their website at
See Also
More Viewpoints Related to HIV/AIDS Among Gay Men

Reader Comments:

Comment by: CT (New York City) Thu., Feb. 13, 2014 at 10:25 am UTC
This is truly shocking. Time and again I am reminded how lucky I am to live in a bubble while others are not so fortunate. Articles and sites like this do so much good.
Reply to this comment

Comment by: RT (NY,NY) Fri., Feb. 7, 2014 at 8:46 am UTC
Great information and great article for educating about exactly what tests need to be done. Thanks !!!!!
Reply to this comment

Comment by: jim (boston) Thu., Feb. 6, 2014 at 3:59 pm UTC
Did I read this correctly? Because you couldn't get the most up to date test available you refused any test at all? If that's true it strikes me as being self-defeatingly obstinate and incredibly irresponsible. I applaud your efforts to stay abreast of the latest science on the subject of std's and to fight for full and equal medical care, but putting your own health, not to mention that of your sexual partners, at risk just to prove a point seems really immature and well, pointless.
Reply to this comment

Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read's Comment Policy.)

Your Name:

Your Location:

(ex: San Francisco, CA)

Your Comment:

Characters remaining:


The content on this page is free of advertiser influence and was produced by our editorial team. See our advertising policy.