The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App 
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol

Promiscuous Gay Nerd: What Makes Sex Good?

October 28, 2013

 1  |  2  |  Next > 

Promiscuous Gay Nerd: What Makes Sex Good?

Last year during a visit to San Francisco over New Year's, I witnessed something truly remarkable. My friend gathered a handful of gays together, poured some freshly brewed tea, and gave an hour-long PowerPoint presentation about the sex he had during the previous 12 months. I've seen a lot when it comes to sex. But I'd never before witnessed such a public display of sexual reflexivity. We went through the highlights. We ruminated about what made for a good sexual encounter, and why some were lackluster. It was an educational exercise in perversion that was, truly, exhilarating.

I left his apartment, came back to my friend's apartment where I was staying, and opened Microsoft Excel. I saved a blank workbook titled "Tricks.xls." (Nerd alert!) This column is the product of tracking the sex that I've been having for the past ten months. People have for years asked me questions about my sex life -- How much? How often? How good? -- and I really had no way to answer most of them with any precision. I estimate that, in my lifetime, I've had sex of some kind with somewhere between 500 and 2,000 guys. That's a pretty huge range. I wouldn't be surprised if it were at the high or low end of it because I simply don't keep track.

It turns out there are benefits to keeping track. When I began this experiment, it was largely out of a desire to know more. I was curious. What makes me tick? I knew the basics, obviously: I generally prefer to get fucked. I like guys with big dicks. And because I live in a college town, I tend to wind up fucking guys a few years younger than me. But what exactly made for good sex? Are there qualities associated with good encounters that I could home in on and better seek out in future partners? And conversely, are there qualities I should steer clear of?

The answer is a resounding yes, and quite frankly, analyzing the data stunned me. But before I get into the analysis, I need to make one thing clear: This is a project about my sex life. What turns me on. What gets me off. It isn't about your sex life -- though I'd love for you to write a comparative analysis. If you created a sex diary, you'd value different things. On a spreadsheet, you'd create different columns. You'd even be likely to have had very different encounters with the exact same guys I reference. This exercise isn't about creating a universal theory of good sex, or suggesting that everyone follow my lead. It's about trying to start a dialogue on what makes sex great.

Because let's face it, for a lot of gay men and plenty of others, sex is a core part of our lives. Shouldn't we be having the best sex possible? And given the 21st-century tools at our disposal -- PrEP, treatment as prevention, seroadaptation, and condoms -- there are now more ways than ever to keep ourselves and our partners healthy while we're at it.


Without further ado, I present to you my spreadsheet. It's a Google doc. Go on, click on it. Take a look. Absorb all the work I've put into it the past ten months.

Let me go over a few basic things. First, I've changed all the names. Matthew isn't really named Matthew, but he is 34 years old according to his profile. I've also anonymized the city names. Entries are ordered by date, but each partner is assigned a unique number. Repeats are numbered as 14.1, 14.2, etc., and colored green. Guys with ratings of 9 or higher are colored red. Overnights are colored purple. And that one orange bar represents an "STI event" -- the time I got syphilis in March. Boo.

For each encounter, I record the venue through which I met the guy and the city in which I met him; his age, dick size, race, and HIV-status; whether we had oral or anal sex, or, because I'm a fan, whether there was rimming involved; whether we used condoms and whether that was pre-arranged or not; whether we used any drugs or intoxicating substances, including alcohol; and the number of orgasms we each had. Then I assign each encounter a subjective score from 1 to 10 (1 being the worst sex ever; 10 being the best sex ever). I also add a series of comments that have proven the most interesting for me to look back on in this analysis.

Sex by the Numbers

Let's start with the easy stuff: the numbers. Are certain factors associated with higher overall scores? This isn't a statistical analysis, by any means. But with 50 encounters with 43 unique partners, I figure there is some kernel of truth in the numbers. At the bottom of the spreadsheet, you'll see I've divvied up the average quality scores by a variety of factors. Of course, some have too few people in them to be meaningful (e.g., the city comparison and some of the race categories). Other categories line up exactly where I expect them to be (e.g., dick size).

But let's check out condoms. I expected higher scores to be associated with sex without condoms. I just intuitively figured that this would be the case. I don't like condoms; they can lead to chafing and painful sex. And god knows how many guys lose their erections repeatedly with them, which is an unending frustration for a bottom in need. All these reasons informed my choice to start using PrEP almost exactly a year ago. While I only used condoms four times over the past nine months, at the very least this didn't necessitate having a horrible time. In fact, the average score for sex with condoms was a bit higher than the average for sex without them. Indeed, I gave a score of 9 or higher to two of the four encounters that involved condoms. While I recognize that this subjective scoring is confounded by god knows how many unnamed factors, this still surprised me.

That said, what does seem to make a difference (albeit a slight one) is whether or not that condom use was planned. I quickly got the sense this year that planning sex without condoms requires breaking a code of silence that makes many gay men uncomfortable. I think part of what makes condomless sex hot is its reputation as a passionate, "in the moment" practice that people associate with less personal responsibility. In many guys' minds, fucking without condoms with a hot guy in the heat of the moment is sexy, whereas planning ahead of time to fuck without condoms is gross and reckless. I think this is reflected in the data: I rated the sex I had without planning ahead to use or not use condoms higher than when we agreed to use or not use condoms ahead of time. Of course, this pattern is largely made possible by PrEP. With PrEP at my side, I feel comfortable leaving the decision to use condoms in my partner's hands.

Let's also take a look at drugs and substance use. As you'll see from the spreadsheet, I'm a fan of poppers. I understand they're not for everyone, and there are important things health-wise that you'll want to pay attention to if you use them (e.g., dangerous interactions with erectile dysfunction meds). That disclaimer aside, although they appear fairly frequently in the "Drugs/Etc." column as you can clearly see, popper use is not necessarily associated with better sex for me. In fact, I suspect that poppers get a bum rap here because I sometimes use them as a crutch for bad sex. Lesson learned: For me, poppers can make great sex even more amazing, but they can't make bad sex better.

The figures for alcohol were even more surprising for me. I don't tend to think of myself as a fan of drunk sex. In fact, I regularly disparage the idea. But the numbers seem to tell a different story. What's going on here? Well, I'll get to this more in the next section, but many of these encounters involved guys I met up with for a drink before we had sex. In many cases, this time together socializing helped develop a chemistry that translated into better sex. Alcohol plays a role here in helping us cozy up to each other, but it's also just a product of spending time together socializing before fucking.

 1  |  2  |  Next > 

More From This Resource Center

Undetectable Viral Load and HIV Prevention: What Do Gay and Bi Men Need to Know?

Do HIV-Negative Gay Men Need Condoms if They're on PrEP? Here's What I Tell My Patients

Related Stories

HIV Prevention, Young Gay Men of Color and the Fourth Wave of HIV Activism
Knowing Your HIV Status Is Sexy, Says New NSFW Video
More on Sex, Dating & HIV for Gay Men

This article was provided by BETA. Visit their website at

Reader Comments:

Comment by: AnotherGayNerd (Manila) Sun., Dec. 1, 2013 at 11:16 am UTC
Hi, I'm a virgin, a horny virgin. This is my first encounter with an article written by you and damn I thought that was hot and heartwarming at the end. I don't know if you would read this but in case you and some of other readers do, I have some things to say about your erhm, research. :))))

I'm astounded by your analytical and statistical approach to your sexual pursuits. The way you interpreted your results was as if you were writing some form of dissertation. It's scientific despite being a reflection. I'd suggest you'd use decision trees and associative mining in machine learning software like rapid miner to make a thorough and really interesting analysis :))))
Reply to this comment
Replies to this comment:
Comment by: Jake Sobo (Online) Mon., Dec. 9, 2013 at 4:43 pm UTC
Thanks for your comment, AnotherGayNerd :) That is FAR beyond my technical expertise. But if you wanted to help me, by all means shoot me an email ;)

Comment by: Charles Martin (Alexandria VA) Fri., Nov. 22, 2013 at 9:42 am UTC
How sad. You should always practice safe sex.
Reply to this comment

Comment by: RayW (Australia) Thu., Oct. 31, 2013 at 4:30 pm UTC
The need for intimacy is innate to most humans. Most of us would know what Jake is talking about when he says his best sex was when he felt intimately connected with his partner. The kissing, the eye contact, the sensation of even the tiniest movements. Which makes the ice epidemic all the more tragic. The craving for the drug high is overwhelming the natural craving for intimacy. It twists and tortures it into a deceitful longing. It makes guys think they're getting intimacy, experiencing something powerful. But they're only getting up close and personal with the drug - not the person they're having *sex* with. Intimacy requires a connection, communication - verbal and non-verbal (especially the shared sensations of skin on skin). Ice puts a shutter down over most of the senses required for this communication. The connection is just not possible.
Reply to this comment

Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read's Comment Policy.)

Your Name:

Your Location:

(ex: San Francisco, CA)

Your Comment:

Characters remaining:


The content on this page is free of advertiser influence and was produced by our editorial team. See our advertising policy.