Advertisement
The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
Read Now: Expert Opinions on HIV Cure Research
  
  • Email Email
  • Comments Comments
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

U.S. News

Iowa Court Hears Criminal HIV Transmission Case

September 12, 2013

On September 11, the Iowa Court of Appeals heard arguments in a case seeking to overturn the 2009 conviction of a man charged with criminal HIV transmission. The case hinged upon an incident in which the man, who knew he had HIV, failed to disclose his status before having protected sex with another man. The new sexual partner also performed an oral sex act on the HIV-infected man, who did not ejaculate at the time. The new sexual partner later reported the incident to the police.

One legal precedent for the case stemmed from the Iowa Supreme Court's 2006 decision to uphold an HIV-infected man's conviction for exposing his partner to semen during oral sex. Christopher Clark, a Lambda Legal senior staff attorney, explained why the Iowa Court of Appeals should not follow this precedent.

Clark stated that both parties agreed the HIV-infected man did not ejaculate during oral sex, and the HIV-infected man's viral load was so low it was undetectable, according to his doctor's tests. CDC has reported reduced risk of HIV transmission through oral sex, and there was no medical consensus on HIV transmission via oral sex without ejaculation.

Iowa's Assistant Attorney General Kevin Cmelik argued that the state's statute aimed to ensure that HIV-infected people disclosed their status to their sexual partners, who then could make an informed decision about the risk of HIV infection from protected or unprotected sex. Cmelik also argued that a 2001 court ruling that an HIV-infected person could be charged with a crime even if ejaculation did not take place during sex provided a legal basis to dismiss the argument that using a condom meant there was no crime.

Back to other news for September 2013

Adapted from:
USA Today
09.11.2013; Grant Rodgers


  
  • Email Email
  • Comments Comments
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

This article was provided by CDC National Prevention Information Network. It is a part of the publication CDC HIV/Hepatitis/STD/TB Prevention News Update.
 
See Also
More on HIV Transmission Cases

No comments have been made.
 

Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)

Your Name:


Your Location:

(ex: San Francisco, CA)

Your Comment:

Characters remaining:

Tools
 

Advertisement