The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App 
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
  • Email Email
  • Comments Comments
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

U.S. News

Minnesota Supreme Court: HIV-Positive Man Wrongly Convicted of Passing Disease

August 22, 2013

The Minnesota Supreme Court unanimously decided this week that an HIV-positive man found guilty for having sex with a man who later developed the infection was convicted wrongly and sided with an appeals court to overturn the original decision. The defendant was convicted more than two years ago under an obscure law that discussed transfer of sperm, blood, or tissue, but did not refer to sexual intercourse.

AIDS activists and the American Civil Liberties Union had followed the case closely. The man maintained he informed his sexual partner that he was HIV-positive. The original jury believed that assertion and found him not guilty by reason of sexual penetration; the jury did find him guilty of attempted assault under the second part of the law. "If this conviction had been upheld, it would have been saying that sex is a lethal weapon," said Dr. Michael Horberg, chair of the HIV Medicine Association. "Obviously, the original intent of the law was specifically for organ and tissue donation, including sperm. That is a vastly different situation than what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home."

The Supreme Court agreed the wording was ambiguous. The 16-page opinion also stated that the term "transfer" in the second section of the law did not include sexual conduct. "While sperm might be characterized as an asset of property in a medical context, such as with respect to fertility, that characterization is not applicable to sperm transmitted to another through sexual conduct," Chief Justice Lorie Gildea wrote.

Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman said that in spite of his displeasure with the final ruling, he encouraged Minnesota lawmakers to clarify the law. "We need clear tools to prosecute folks who have serious communicable diseases not necessarily limited to HIV and AIDS, but others that can cause serious harm," he said.

Back to other news for August 2013

Adapted from:
Star Tribune (Minneapolis)
08.21.2013; Abby Simons

  • Email Email
  • Comments Comments
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

This article was provided by CDC National Prevention Information Network. It is a part of the publication CDC HIV/Hepatitis/STD/TB Prevention News Update.
See Also
More on HIV Transmission Cases

No comments have been made.

Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read's Comment Policy.)

Your Name:

Your Location:

(ex: San Francisco, CA)

Your Comment:

Characters remaining: