The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App 
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
  • Email Email
  • Comments Comments
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

U.S. News

HIV Case Headed to Minnesota Supreme Court Draws National Interest

April 1, 2013

The case of an HIV-infected man in Minnesota who was convicted then cleared of a felony for having unprotected sex, is drawing attention from legal and medical experts nationwide. Prosecutors charged the defendant under Minnesota state statute 609.2241, which states that a person commits a crime by transmitting HIV or other serious communicable disease through "sexual penetration with another person without having first informed the other person" or by the "transfer of blood, sperm, organs, or tissues, except as deemed necessary for medical research or if disclosed on donor screening forms." The defendant's partner testified he had sex several times with him, but it was not clear how the partner contracted HIV.

The jury did not convict the defendant on the first subdivision of statute 609.2241, but did convict him on the second subdivision. The Minnesota Court of Appeals overturned the conviction two to one, stating the 17-year-old statute did not clarify whether it is illegal for people with communicable diseases to have sex if they have notified their partner.

In response to the appellate court decision, Hennepin County's Attorney Mike Freeman successfully petitioned the state Supreme Court to hear the case. Freeman stated that the case is about stopping sexual predators from spreading disease rather than about persecuting HIV-infected people.

The defense attorneys argue that the second subdivision of the statute addresses medical procedures, not sexual intercourse. HIV medical specialists and advocacy organizations have supported the court of appeals' decision. The Minnesota AIDS Project and the American Civil Liberties Union warn against criminalizing people with HIV, especially since advances in medical treatment now make it possible for couples in which one or both partners have HIV to conceive and bear healthy children. HIV advocacy organizations urge lawmakers to rewrite the state statute based on justice and current science.

Back to other news for April 2013

Adapted from:
Star Tribune (Minneapolis)
04.30.2012; Abby Simons

  • Email Email
  • Comments Comments
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

This article was provided by CDC National Prevention Information Network. It is a part of the publication CDC HIV/Hepatitis/STD/TB Prevention News Update.
See Also
More on HIV Transmission Cases

No comments have been made.

Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read's Comment Policy.)

Your Name:

Your Location:

(ex: San Francisco, CA)

Your Comment:

Characters remaining: