Commentary & Opinion
Shrinking U.S. Investment in Scientific R&D "Affects the Whole World"
March 1, 2013
In his State of the Union address on February 12, President Barack Obama "called for a new era of scientific discovery," an Economist editorial states, adding, "This would mean spending more on research." But "[a]s The Economist went to press, America's government was about to do the opposite," the editorial states, noting federal spending will be cut on March 1 under what is known as the "sequester." The editorial continues, "Among the areas to be squeezed is [research and development (R&D)], and medical research in particular."
"For years America has enjoyed pre-eminence in research, but this is fading," the Economist states, summarizing research spending in the U.S. compared with other countries. "With the sequester, public investment will shrink further," the editorial writes, adding, "These cuts will speed the erosion of American supremacy in research." The editorial concludes that the effects will be felt worldwide, writing, "[T]he real problem is absolute, not relative, and affects the whole world, not just America. R&D is a rare type of public spending that stimulates growth. Knowledge is cumulative, easy to share and generates benefits that spill rapidly across borders" (3/2).
This article was provided by Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. It is a part of the publication Kaiser Daily Global Health Policy Report. Visit the Kaiser Family Foundation's website to find out more about their activities, publications and services.
Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.)