July 6, 2012
As of July 5, 2012, there are 1,958 individuals on ADAP waiting lists in nine states. This week, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and North Carolina saw increases in the number of clients on their waiting lists. Florida, Nebraska, and Virginia saw minor decreases, while Idaho and Montana's numbers remained steady. To see a list of states with access restrictions please visit NASTAD's website.
The total number of individuals on waiting lists has decreased 79 percent since a high of 9,298 individuals on September 1, 2011. Regular FY2011 and FY2012 ADAP funding, along with FY2011 emergency funds, have helped to alleviate some of the waiting lists and other cost containment measures. Additional funding is still needed to further decrease or stabilize the waiting lists.
FY2012 emergency funding for ADAPs, including both the $35 million in new funding that President Obama announced on World AIDS Day and the $40 million in continuation funding for FY2012, was anticipated to be awarded by July 1, 2012. The $35 million in new funding was available for all Part B grantees. Awards will be capped at $7 million with a minimum award of $50,000. The $40 million in continuation funding was available for competition only for the 30 Part B grantees that received FY2011 ADAP emergency funding. The new funding is expected to further reduce ADAP waiting lists and other cost containment measures currently in place.
Regarding FY2013 funding, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved a Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations bill that includes a $30 million increase for ADAP over FY2012 funding levels while continuing the $35 million announced on World AIDS Day as part of the ADAP base funding. President Obama's FY2013 budget proposal included a $67 million increase for ADAP over FY2012 levels, for a total of $1 billion. The President's FY2013 budget also includes the $35 million announced on World AIDS Day. The House is expected to mark-up their Labor-HHS Appropriations bill after the holiday recess.
As a result of the variability of ADAP enrollment and funding, waiting lists will likely remain and continue to fluctuate, particularly with increased efforts to identify new individuals living with HIV or re-engage individuals lost to care. Many ADAPs continue to struggle financially, including those without any cost-containment measures currently in place. Four ADAPs currently anticipate the need to implement cost-containment measures or a waiting list during the ADAP FY2012 grant year (began April 1, 2012).
|ADAPs With Waiting Lists|
(1,958 Individuals in 9 States*, as of July 5, 2012)
|State||Number of Individuals on ADAP Waiting List||Percent of the Total ADAP Waiting List||Increase/ Decrease From Previous Reporting Period||Date Waiting List Began|
|North Carolina||275||14%||10||January 2010|
* As a result of FY2011 ADAP emergency funding, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Montana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah and Virginia were able to reduce the overall number of individuals on their waiting lists.
Six ADAPs have previously lowered their financial eligibility as part of their cost-containment plans since September 2009. Illinois, North Dakota, Ohio and South Carolina lowered their eligibility level to 300% FPL. Utah lowered their eligibility level to 250% FPL, and Arkansas lowered their eligibility level to 200% FPL. Previously, all states had FPLs of 400% and above. As a result of these measures, a total of 445 individuals in three states, Arkansas (99), Ohio (257), and Utah (89), were disenrolled. Illinois, North Dakota, and South Carolina grandfathered their clients that fell within the income levels into their programs. No other ADAPs currently anticipate further changes to their financial eligibility.
Alabama: reduced formulary, capped enrollment
Arkansas: reduced formulary
Florida: reduced formulary, transitioned 5,403 clients to Welvista from February 15 to March 31, 2011
Georgia: reduced formulary, implemented medical criteria, participating in the Alternative Method Demonstration Project
Illinois: reduced formulary, instituted monthly expenditure cap ($2,000 per client per month), disenrolled clients not accessing ADAP for 90 days
Kentucky: reduced formulary
Louisiana: discontinued reimbursement of laboratory assays
North Carolina: reduced formulary
North Dakota: capped enrollment, instituted annual expenditure cap
Puerto Rico: reduced formulary
Tennessee: reduced formulary
Utah: reduced formulary
Virginia: reduced formulary, restricted eligibility criteria, transitioned 204 clients onto waiting list
Washington: instituted client cost sharing, reduced formulary, only paying insurance premiums for clients currently on antiretrovirals
Wyoming: capped enrollment, reduced formulary, instituted client cost sharing
Alaska: reduce formulary
California: instituting client cost sharing
Georgia: instituting client cost sharing
Virginia: enrolling clients into PCIPs
Case management services are being provided to ADAP waiting list clients through ADAP (1 ADAP), Part B (5 ADAPs), contracted agencies (7 ADAPs) and other agencies, including other Parts of Ryan White (4 ADAPs).
For clients on ADAP waiting lists who are currently on or in need of medications, nine ADAP waiting list states confirm that ADAP waiting list clients are receiving medications through either pharmaceutical company patient assistance programs (PAPs) Welvista, or other mechanisms available within the state.