The Body: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource
Follow Us Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter Download Our App 
Professionals >> Visit The Body PROThe Body en Espanol
  • Email Email
  • Comments Comments
  •  (5)
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

Prosecuting HIV: Take the Test -- and Risk Arrest?

May/June 2012

 < Prev  |  1  |  2  |  3 

Bad Public Health Policy


Reducing HIV transmission can only be achieved by combating criminalization, ignorance, and the associated stigma.

HIV criminalization discourages people at risk from getting tested. Studies show that people with HIV who are aware of their status are more responsible in their sexual behavior than those who are unaware they have HIV. Testing is a basic tool of HIV prevention as well as an essential gateway to care.

Criminalization statutes also make it more difficult for people with HIV to disclose their status. Disclosing can be emotionally difficult, risking rejection from family and friends -- often with great insult or abuse -- and can jeopardize one's employment, housing, relationships, or personal safety.

Criminalization of HIV legitimizes the ignorance, homophobia, racism, and sex-phobia that fuel the inflated fears of those with HIV. It undermines efforts to prevent new HIV infections and provide access to care in many ways:

  • It undercuts the most basic HIV and STD prevention message: that every person must take responsibility for his or her own sexual health.
  • Prosecuting the failure to disclose values the "right" to an illusion of safety over the privacy rights of those with HIV.
  • Most new infections are caused by sexual contact with people who are unaware they have HIV, yet only those who have taken responsibility and gotten tested are subject to prosecution.
  • Ignorance of one's HIV status is the best defense against a "failure to disclose" prosecution, a powerful disincentive to getting tested and learning one's HIV status.
  • Young African American men who have sex with men are among those at highest risk of acquiring HIV, yet also among the most difficult to persuade to get tested. The prospect of prosecution for failing to disclose -- especially since these prosecutions often boil down to a "he-said/he-said" or "he-said/she-said" situation -- is a powerful disincentive to disclosure. "Take the test and risk arrest" is the message increasingly being heard on the streets.


Racism and Homophobia

Prosecuting HIV nondisclosure but not prosecuting the failure to disclose other STDs also reflects an unconscious racism and homophobia. Human papilloma virus (HPV) provides a useful contrast. HPV causes a variety of cancers, including almost all cervical, genital, and anal cancers. Cervical cancer alone killed 4,000 women in the U.S. in 2009; every year hundreds of thousands of women in the U.S. get diagnosed with cervical dysplasia, which is caused by HPV and is a precursor to cervical cancer.

By the age of 50 more than 80% of American women will have contracted at least one strain of HPV. Yet unlike HIV, HPV is not associated with "outlaw sexuality" or with specific minority groups. HIV is associated with anal intercourse, gay men, African-Americans, and injection drug users, so racism and homophobia are inextricably linked with HIV stigma, discrimination, and criminalization.


Since the earliest days of the epidemic, stigma and ignorance have hindered an effective response to the HIV epidemic. Stigma and ignorance sanctioned in the law are its most extreme manifestation and are inherently unjust. HIV-specific criminal statutes do not slow the transmission of HIV but may facilitate its further spread. Reducing HIV transmission can be achieved only when combatting HIV criminalization and ignorance, and the associated stigma, are part of the approach.

To this end, nearly 40 HIV, human rights, public health, and other organizations founded the Positive Justice Project (PJP) in the fall of 2010 to end government reliance on a positive HIV test result as proof of intent to harm. PJP is housed at The Center for HIV Law & Policy, a resource for leaders, attorneys, and advocates interested in HIV-related discrimination and criminalization. PJP's Resource Bank ( is a comprehensive database of research, reports, court decisions, briefs, policy analyses, and other materials of importance to people with HIV.

Update: In recent weeks, there have been a number of new developments concerning criminalization. Iowa State Senator Matthew McCoy introduced legislation to amend that state's HIV statute to make it apply only in cases where there is a malicious intent to harm the other party, differentiate the penalty depending on whether or not the virus was transmitted, and remove the requirement that those convicted under the statute must be placed on the state's sex offender registry. Meanwhile, several Maryland legislators have introduced legislation to dramatically increase the penalties under their statute, from three to a maximum of 25 years. Advocates in a number of states have begun to organize to build statewide coalitions to work for reform of their statutes.

Go to to watch HIV is Not a Crime, the short film about three people who were prosecuted for non-disclosure, including Nick Rhoades, the Iowa man sentenced to 25 years and lifetime sex offender registration.

Reprinted with permission from Achieve, a publication of ACRIA and GMHC.

Sean Strub is executive director of The Sero Project, Senior Advisor to and a co-founder of the Positive Justice Project, founder of, and co-chairs the board of directors of the Global Network of People with HIV/AIDS/North America. He has been living with HIV for more than 30 years.

Got a comment on this article? Write to us at

 < Prev  |  1  |  2  |  3 

  • Email Email
  • Comments Comments
  •  (5)
  • Printable Single-Page Print-Friendly
  • Glossary Glossary

This article was provided by Positively Aware. It is a part of the publication Positively Aware. Visit Positively Aware's website to find out more about the publication.
See Also
More on HIV Transmission Cases

Reader Comments:

Comment by: Disel (Houston) Tue., Jun. 5, 2012 at 2:58 pm UTC
HIV criminalization is only adding to the spread of HIV due to the fact that many people r now not wanting to get tested because of those stories they hear of people going to prison! HIV criminalization shows how ignorant we still are 30 some years into this epidemic and how far we still have to go to end HIV and its stigma!!!!! people don't go to prison for Hep-c, Herpes and other STDS!
Reply to this comment

Comment by: John B. (Austin Texas) Sun., Jun. 3, 2012 at 5:34 pm UTC
The people most at risk for new transmissions are the young and women of color. If the pharmaceutical companies cannot guarantee new transmissions then they cannot rely on the extortive expense (currently $2300 a month for Atripla for ONE MONTH or 30 pills!) and that is bad business. America is managing this infection of a virus (same process as a cold) just like they manage anything else and that's FOR PROFIT! Follow the trail of money and you will find those in control of the debate...the end.
Reply to this comment

Comment by: Gina M. Bright (Norfolk, VA) Sat., Jun. 2, 2012 at 9:18 am UTC
Sean Strub's article gets to the heart of how criminalizing any disease, especially HIV/AIDS, results in persistent stigma. I am one of those AIDS advocates who has attempted to overturn this stigma in my recent book, Plague-Making and the AIDS Epidemic: A Story of Discrimination (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012). My book is a cultural history of how and why diseases labeled plagues produce discrimination for the carriers.
AIDS was introduced as a plague in our American society primarily because many who suffered from the disease were homosexulas and IVDUs. Discrimination against them was severe and persistent. Portraits of the people with AIDS I have cared for since the 1980s open each chapter and a window to all of those people who have been treated like plague cariers.

I hope people read the book. It is available on

Never forget.

Gina M. Bright, RN, PhD
Reply to this comment

Comment by: Zim Fri., Jun. 1, 2012 at 2:39 pm UTC
How many HIV "support groups" still feel a need to chastise people about the need to "protect their partners with disclosure"? Just a few minutes ago, I saw this very website talk about a campaign the GMHC is running that pushes disclosure amongst men of color, implicitly blaming them for the epidemic in that community. Not even a year ago, "HIV stops with me" was still conflating the issue and shifting the burden of prevention to people who live with the virus while misunderstanding disclosure as a relevant issue in prevention. None of these issues seem to get the outrage they deserve. You've written a brilliant treatise here Sean, but we need less brilliance and more anger. Too many people with HIV voluntarily ghettoize ourselves, or agree that disclosure is somehow relevant to the pertinent concern of transmission. Until our mindset changes, we can't expect the world to change.
Reply to this comment

Comment by: Tom M. (Providence, RI) Fri., May. 11, 2012 at 11:10 pm UTC
This is insane.....if this becomes law people wont get tested. We have enough problems with people spreading a disease they dont know they have...lets not give them another resaon not to get tested for fear of being prosocuted.
Reply to this comment

Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before
adding your comment, please read's Comment Policy.)

Your Name:

Your Location:

(ex: San Francisco, CA)

Your Comment:

Characters remaining: