Only 1 in 5 Teens in the US Gets Tested for HIVJanuary 11, 2012 It's no secret that testing young people for HIV can be difficult. Between doctors not wanting to test their young patients, young people not wanting their parents to know that they are sexually active, and even young folks not wanting to acknowledge that they are at risk, teens are falling through the HIV testing gaps. And the Centers for Disease Control 2009 national Youth Risk Behavior Survey confirms as much. By looking at data compiled from more than 7,500 sexually active teens across the U.S., researchers found that in 2009, about one in five of them had ever been tested for HIV. Researchers also found:
So what can be done? In an editorial about this report, Lawrence D'Angelo, M.D., of the Children's National Medical Center in Washington, D.C., calls the report's findings "disturbing" and wants HIV testing to be done universally at the age of 13 and to be repeated every year in all young people who are at risk until they are 18. From there, testing should be done every three years, he says. D'Angelo's recommendations fall somewhat in line with the CDC's testing recommendations, but differ from the recent recommendations handed down by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) last November, calling for doctors to begin screening at-risk teens between the ages of 16 and 18, but only those who live in an area that has a 1 percent prevalence rate. What do you think? Should sexually active teens be tested for HIV every year starting at 13? Kellee Terrell is the former news editor for TheBody.com and TheBodyPRO.com. Follow Kellee on Twitter: @kelleent. Copyright © 2012 Remedy Health Media, LLC. All rights reserved. ![]() When Will Routine Testing for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Be the Routine for Adolescents? This article was provided by TheBody.com.
Comment by: Josh
(NY)
Fri., Jan. 13, 2012 at 3:23 pm EST Let's just get that vaccine and cure going :) That could be quicker than getting mandatory laws in place...to enforce testing. How about a serious ad campaign during Super Bowl? What is needed is interest in talking about this more...
Comment by: Brad O
(Washington, DC)
Fri., Jan. 13, 2012 at 10:45 am EST In think testing all teens at age 13 is a good idea, and could be more easily sold, I think, if the pitch was "for the next 4 years we will do this to try and reverse trends". In addition, now that Orasure has submitted the third and final phase of its trials to the FDA for approval of self-testing, we should start introducing self-testing education in the schools.
Comment by: Paul
Fri., Jan. 13, 2012 at 5:42 am EST "you have to accept consequences for bad choices"-(shakes head in disbelief)-
Comment by: Tony
(Beautiful Bakersfield)
Thu., Jan. 12, 2012 at 12:30 pm EST Yes. Testing for teens who have put themselves at risk is very very important. First of all you become aware of the whole idea of a window period, that you have to accept consequences for bad choices - that's just a fact of life. Secondly, if you may be infected the best place you could possibly be to find that out is at the clinic. Most importantly for teens, or anyone I think, if you've put yourseld at risk, but then thest negative, you get to reflect on your future.Nobody's perfect, and nobody can change their past, but you can start over againg with a "clean" HIV/STD test result rather than think that you're infected with something, or you're goining to get infected with something, and their's nothing you can do about it. The most valuable natural resource of any society is it's youth why wouldn't we want do do everything we possibly can to protect and value all of them.:)
Add Your Comment:
(Please note: Your name and comment will be public, and may even show up in
Internet search results. Be careful when providing personal information! Before adding your comment, please read TheBody.com's Comment Policy.) |
|